I'm sure the money that secured the sale of the shares from the administrator came from the fans. Why would anyone seek to deny that? All who made a donation were included as a member of the society and treated as having one vote. It wasn't possible to sustain that model and there was a change made to charge a £5 subscription. The original membership was the basis for several years without any payments being asked for. It wasn't practical to try to maintain an organisation with several thousand members especially when the main revenue earning method was taken back by DFC, Deetv. There was a decision to charge an annual subscription and everyone could retain their membership by paying this.
DFCSS has done absolutely nothing that is not within the terms of their rules. I've tried to retain an interest in DFCSS because of the rights they have to restrain FPS from certain actions. I think FPS have shown considerable financial support for the managers that they have employed and unfortunately this has not produced better results.There isn't any agenda from DFCSS. From what I see they correctly understood that the restrictions that they have about the ground, the name and the colours of the club are matters of concern for all supporters and they have acted in exactly the sort of public spirited way by bringing to the attention of their members the fact that FPS would like to move to a new stadium, which is one of the restrictions imposed on FPS. The power to accept changes to these restrictions lies with the board of DFCSS, and it is to their credit that they have employed legal counsel, and shared the situation with their members. Neither DFCSS nor FPS are villains in this discussion. They both want the club to be successful but to get there FPS have a plan to build a new stadium.
I'm sorry you distrust DFCSS but I think in the current situation they have acted with the best interests of all supporters and they genuinely would like to know what they think about the situation they are facing. Do they sell their shares to the club and give up the restrictions that their A shares impose on FPS, or is there another way to act?


Reply With Quote

