+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 26 of 26 FirstFirst ... 16242526
Results 251 to 260 of 277

Thread: O/T Trussed in Leader gone

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by animallittle3 View Post
    Inevitably though in the future green energy will have to be sold to consumers at a price they can afford whilst still maintaining profitability in order to invest .
    Yes which could be done via a state owned energy company that Labour proposes. That will lower prices but as you say would need to be profitable to invest. If that " profit" isn't there the government would have to subsidise it via grants and aid. The money coming from taxation etc so Joe Public pays anyway. Plus it's worth remembering that those types of state aid for companies was a complete break of the rules when we were in the EU.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    26,779
    Quote Originally Posted by Grist_To_The_Mill View Post
    Yes which could be done via a state owned energy company that Labour proposes. That will lower prices but as you say would need to be profitable to invest. If that " profit" isn't there the government would have to subsidise it via grants and aid. The money coming from taxation etc so Joe Public pays anyway. Plus it's worth remembering that those types of state aid for companies was a complete break of the rules when we were in the EU.
    Would a state owned energy company be a sure way to ensure prices were kept at a price consumers could afford whilst profit was invested as the subsidy ? .

    We've had a go at this in other sectors in decades gone by and it didn't work out that way .

    Isn't competition between suppliers the one sure way of keeping prices low ?

    I'd be more for competition between suppliers but robust regulation personally , regulation around the amount of money paid out to shareholders and how much investment is actually coming out of the profit .

    In other words the pie cut in to such a way everyone gets the benefit .

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by animallittle3 View Post
    Would a state owned energy company be a sure way to ensure prices were kept at a price consumers could afford whilst profit was invested as the subsidy ? .

    We've had a go at this in other sectors in decades gone by and it didn't work out that way .

    Isn't competition between suppliers the one sure way of keeping prices low ?

    I'd be more for competition between suppliers but robust regulation personally , regulation around the amount of money paid out to shareholders and how much investment is actually coming out of the profit .

    In other words the pie cut in to such a way everyone gets the benefit .
    No, I'm sceptical that a state owned energy company would work.

    It would run for a short time successfully with the existing assets but the costs of R&D, infrastructure, inprovements etc would eventually kill it.

Page 26 of 26 FirstFirst ... 16242526

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •