|
| + Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
There are millions in this country who would love to be on that sort of money GM.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/...um-wage-report
Doesn't exactly support your argument gm
& how many is many
Youve gone all tangent on me Exile....I'll ask you directly, "would you rather earn £150k or £50k?£
In relation to polarisation of income thats a different argument, there are some areas in the country where hardly anyone earns less than £50k...you have tangented around low income which although I acknowledge is a different
I'll give you two guesses
My post was to add balance
because for everyone "earning" in excess of £150 k it's not a bad idea to reflect on those picking up minimum wage or less which means trying to live on £300 approx per week which is in todays market, impossible .But you can always apply for benefits to subsidise those companies who pay such sums[and there are a lot of them but who's checking] or even use food banks
Really suprised Kerr isn't on to this in the same way he is with Corbyn on tuition fees.
Funny you should say that, Wan. When I saw the Boris announcement yesterday, I reflected upon the different style of bribes to the middle classes and their costs. Around £9.5bn for the tax band alteration and £11bn for abolishing tuition fees with better ways to use that money for both.
Wage growth in the country and the failure to keep up with it means that the higher rate tax band is catching far more people than it was ever intended to and I agree with the stance that taxation generally should be as low as possible, but this isn't the right time for an alteration to the tax band (and I say that as someone who would benefit from it).