Covid vaccines

[sinkov]

"it's gimmers like me with more money than sense"

That half sentence will be stored in evidence and forever used against you sinkov.

Am I supposed to worry about that ? I don't think so.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

Am I supposed to worry about that ? I don't think so.

A loaded gimmer sounds fecking dangerous to me sinkov.

[sinkov]

A loaded gimmer sounds fecking dangerous to me sinkov.

Viking Cruises and Cunard don't think so BT, the brochures just keep on coming. They must love me.

[Balanbam00]

WHO investigation into source of COVID in China becomes a farce
WHO experts have arbitrarily dismissed claims that virus originated from biosafety lab in Wuhan

https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4126342

The World Health Organization's (WHO) month-long investigation into the origin of COVID-19 descended into farce with a rushed and bizarre conclusion to a belated press conference in China that dismissed suspicions the virus could have originated in a laboratory leak, saying it was "extremely unlikely."

The WHO experts did not present any meaningful evidence to back up their conclusion, and instead, made it an obvious endorsement of whatever China said. How could they make a conclusion before tracking down the animal reservoir of the virus?

The organization also dodged the question about whether or not the Chinese military-backed lab conducted extensive research on deadly bat viruses, concluding the leak was extremely unlikely as the lab is "one of the highest-level biosafety labs in the world." How could the WHO experts be so certain that a virus didn't escape the lab a year after suspicions were raised, or be so confident there was no cover-up? The team of experts even announced the absurd idea of "investigating into the possibility of cold chain transmission." It added "more work was needed to identify the genuine source of the virus," which an expert said could focus on South East Asia.

On the same day, Taiwan convened a national security meeting and announced that it would preemptively react to China's emerging Nipah virus. This could be the next major threat to Asia and is transmitted through contaminated food and feces

As the WHO acts in favor of China instead of universal interest, Taiwan should not bother to ask for a seat in the organization, while the Biden administration should reconsider its vow to reverse Donald Trump's planned WHO withdrawal.

It was obviously a smart decision for Trump to cut ties with the WHO as the organization has continued to make bad decisions. It has also ignored RNA assessment reports from prominent virologists that suggest the novel coronavirus originated in Wuhan as a result of some sort of lab accident and gave birth to genetic recombination.

Also, the so-called laboratory notebook the WHO cited, which is supposed to remain intact, could have been altered after the incident. Our question is: Were these experts absolutely sure that they read the original copy?

The world has been deeply infiltrated by communist China, so we should take note of the rampant disinformation that is being disseminated and supported by fake experts and scholars. Media outlets should have questioned the integrity of the WHO's conclusions, instead of relaying the fake messages to the world.

[Supersub6]

WHO investigation into source of COVID in China becomes a farce
WHO experts have arbitrarily dismissed claims that virus originated from biosafety lab in Wuhan

https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4126342

The World Health Organization's (WHO) month-long investigation into the origin of COVID-19 descended into farce with a rushed and bizarre conclusion to a belated press conference in China that dismissed suspicions the virus could have originated in a laboratory leak, saying it was "extremely unlikely."

The WHO experts did not present any meaningful evidence to back up their conclusion, and instead, made it an obvious endorsement of whatever China said. How could they make a conclusion before tracking down the animal reservoir of the virus?

The organization also dodged the question about whether or not the Chinese military-backed lab conducted extensive research on deadly bat viruses, concluding the leak was extremely unlikely as the lab is "one of the highest-level biosafety labs in the world." How could the WHO experts be so certain that a virus didn't escape the lab a year after suspicions were raised, or be so confident there was no cover-up? The team of experts even announced the absurd idea of "investigating into the possibility of cold chain transmission." It added "more work was needed to identify the genuine source of the virus," which an expert said could focus on South East Asia.

On the same day, Taiwan convened a national security meeting and announced that it would preemptively react to China's emerging Nipah virus. This could be the next major threat to Asia and is transmitted through contaminated food and feces

As the WHO acts in favor of China instead of universal interest, Taiwan should not bother to ask for a seat in the organization, while the Biden administration should reconsider its vow to reverse Donald Trump's planned WHO withdrawal.

It was obviously a smart decision for Trump to cut ties with the WHO as the organization has continued to make bad decisions. It has also ignored RNA assessment reports from prominent virologists that suggest the novel coronavirus originated in Wuhan as a result of some sort of lab accident and gave birth to genetic recombination.

Also, the so-called laboratory notebook the WHO cited, which is supposed to remain intact, could have been altered after the incident. Our question is: Were these experts absolutely sure that they read the original copy?

The world has been deeply infiltrated by communist China, so we should take note of the rampant disinformation that is being disseminated and supported by fake experts and scholars. Media outlets should have questioned the integrity of the WHO's conclusions, instead of relaying the fake messages to the world.

In other word Balan are you asking "Who's pocket are they in?"
There is a lot more to this whole thing than we mere mortals will ever get to know about. The only thing that I have been certain about right from the start is the fact that China will come out of all this in a stronger position, both economically and politically, adn this is what they wanted.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

In other word Balan are you asking "Who's pocket are they in?"
There is a lot more to this whole thing than we mere mortals will ever get to know about. The only thing that I have been certain about right from the start is the fact that China will come out of all this in a stronger position, both economically and politically, adn this is what they wanted.

I don't think so Supersub6, karma has a funny way of biting wrongdoers in the arse.

[Balanbam00]

Encouraging news in the Jerusalem post this morning. https://www.jpost.com

Coronavirus: Infection down 75% after first Pfizer shot.

“This is the first study assessing effectiveness of a single vaccine dose in real life conditions."
Data released by Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer on Friday showed that coronavirus infections were reduced by 75% after the first dose of the Pfizer coronavirus vaccine.

The data, published in the peer-reviewed Lancet medical journal, centered on a study of around 9,000 Sheba healthcare workers, around 7,000 of which received their first dose in January. Sheba’s team found a 75% decrease in all infections and an 85% reduction in symptomatic infections between 15-28 days after vaccination.

According to Prof. Gili Regev-Yochay, director of the hospital’s Infectious Disease Epidemiology Unit, only 170 people became infected during the two week period. Of those who contracted the virus, 99 showed symptoms. Eighty-nine of the sick were unvaccinated.
“In real life, the data looks at least as good as in the clinical trials,” Regev-Yochay said. “The first dose is even more effective than we thought.”

She said the hospital is now completing research on the impact of the second dose, which she said researchers still believe is essential. However, she noted that the research supports the British government’s decision to spread out the time between the first and second shots of the vaccine in order to inoculate more people.

[kritichris]

If Daszak has that conflict of interest what was the WHO doing in using him in their investigation? It stinks.

[sinkov]

If Daszak has that conflict of interest what was the WHO doing in using him in their investigation? It stinks.

The whole WHO set up stinks Chris, their Wuhan Lab whitewash was ludicrous. The Donald got a lot wrong, but he got it right when he withdrew American funding from them. But so many still take them seriously, which is how China likes it.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

The whole WHO set up stinks Chris, their Wuhan Lab whitewash was ludicrous. The Donald got a lot wrong, but he got it right when he withdrew American funding from them. But so many still take them seriously, which is how China likes it.

WHO & the UN are the planet's greatest danger, both are seriously overfunded and totally fecking useless. I never agreed with much the Orange Buffoon came out with but he was bob on with the WHO.

I read somewhere recently that UN delegates fill up the TRUMP hotel(s) in New York paying exorbitant rates, so he leaves them alone. Never one to pass up an honest buck is Donald.