+ Visit Scotland Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 54

Thread: Salmond v Cameron

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    5,701

    re: Salmond v Cameron

    [quote="Macaroni_Pie" argument. I would add to that that I believe it's fundamentally incorrect to have someone who is disenfranchised to provide the argument[/quote]

    Aye Mac Pie you make a valid point about Cameron and his

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    12,876

    re: Salmond v Cameron

    Aye and SNP politicians are never 'riding the gravy train'.


  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    8,452

    re: Salmond v Cameron

    we have more chance as a nation in keeping our own politicans in order and more chance of having a say in our own government than we ever will in Westminster

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,331

    re: Salmond v Cameron

    Quote Originally Posted by BertrandRussell
    Aye and SNP politicians are never 'riding the gravy train'.

    like the First Minister going to events supporting Scottish sportsmen/sporting events and business events promoting brand Scotland the exact same thing his labour predecessor Jack McConnell done say the first minister did not go to these events he would be accused of snubbing the event or snubbing a Scottish sportsman/men/woman/women ... it is next to impossible to be on a gravy train in Holyrood all MSPs expenses are online available for all to see/scrutinise

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    11,469

    re: Salmond v Cameron

    Quote Originally Posted by Sir_Walter_Timslayer
    So Cameron takes part in a debate and he's accused of being a snooty Tory telling us all what to do.

    Or he doesn't take part in a debate and he's a bottle merchant.

    Salmond really really needs Cameron to debate with him cos win lose or draw he can paint him as the typical English Old Etonian type. He is running out of ideas and is scraping the bottom of the barrel.

    IMHO Cameron has no need to debate with Salmond, why should he, it's only Scots that are voting isn't it? If there is to be a debate, it should be the Yes v No campaigns, so it should be Alistair Darling. Oh, but Salmond has already bottled out of a debate with Darling.
    you dont half talk a load of tripe mate

    the head of the Scottish Govt should debate with the head of the Uk govt because they are the two that hold any power.

    will dave ever say his position on shared currency?

    will dave ever ask teh commission to clarify teh position of Scotland and UK

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    5,701

    re: S they are almond v Cameron

    Quote Originally Posted by BertrandRussell
    Aye and SNP politicians are never 'riding the gravy train'.

    Actually they don't .Compaired to Scottish Labour MPs they are saints, Boyo himself Alistair Darling flipped his home four times making thousands in the process, Scottish MPs have been letting out their privately owned homes whilst claiming rent for staying in other accommodation. Jim Murphy Iain McKenzie, Ian Davidson have all stolen money from the tax payers doing this, Gordon Brown used his expenses to pay his brother Andrew £6,577 for cleaning work at his Westminster flat between 2004 and 2006. Michael Martin who as Commons speaker fought to prevent us punters finding out about MPs' expenses claims spent more than £1,400 on chauffeurs in his Glasgow constituency. Devine is doing time fur nicking Tax payers money, The Celtic Chairman John Reid spent like there was no tomorrow all on the tax payers expense, The list goes on and on all Labour MPs riding the ol

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    11,469

    re: Salmond v Cameron

    Quote Originally Posted by Macaroni_Pie
    So Cameron takes part in a debate and he's accused of being a snooty Tory telling us all what to do.

    Or he doesn't take part in a debate and he's a bottle merchant.

    Salmond really really needs Cameron to debate with him cos win lose or draw he can paint him as the typical English Old Etonian type. He is running out of ideas and is scraping the bottom of the barrel.

    IMHO Cameron has no need to debate with Salmond, why should he, it's only Scots that are voting isn't it? If there is to be a debate, it should be the Yes v No campaigns, so it should be Alistair Darling. Oh, but Salmond has already bottled out of a debate with Darling.
    Absolute Cr*p Cameron as the PM of the UK has a duty to defend his Union irispective if he is a snooty tory or not !!! The fact your happy to be ruled by a "snooty tory is another matter.
    He pe

  8. #28

    re: Salmond v Cameron

    Quote Originally Posted by JimmyHaze
    we have more chance as a nation in keeping our own politicans in order
    Of course we do. We would never let an arsonist, a perjurer or a wife beater into our parliament. Perish the thought.

  9. #29

    re: Salmond v Cameron

    Quote Originally Posted by stewarty27
    So Cameron takes part in a debate and he's accused of being a snooty Tory telling us all what to do.

    Or he doesn't take part in a debate and he's a bottle merchant.

    Salmond really really needs Cameron to debate with him cos win lose or draw he can paint him as the typical English Old Etonian type. He is running out of ideas and is scraping the bottom of the barrel.

    IMHO Cameron has no need to debate with Salmond, why should he, it's only Scots that are voting isn't it? If there is to be a debate, it should be the Yes v No campaigns, so it should be Alistair Darling. Oh, but Salmond has already bottled out of a debate with Darling.
    Absolute Cr*p Cameron as the PM of the UK has a duty to defend his Union irispective if he is a snooty tory or not !!! The fact your happy to be

  10. #30

    re: Salmond v Cameron

    Quote Originally Posted by stoneyatvt
    So Cameron takes part in a debate and he's accused of being a snooty Tory telling us all what to do.

    Or he doesn't take part in a debate and he's a bottle merchant.

    Salmond really really needs Cameron to debate with him cos win lose or draw he can paint him as the typical English Old Etonian type. He is running out of ideas and is scraping the bottom of the barrel.

    IMHO Cameron has no need to debate with Salmond, why should he, it's only Scots that are voting isn't it? If there is to be a debate, it should be the Yes v No campaigns, so it should be Alistair Darling. Oh, but Salmond has already bottled out of a debate with Darling.
    you dont half talk a load of tripe mate

    the head of the Scottish Govt should debate with the head of the Uk govt because they are the two that hold any power.

    will dave ever say his position on shared currency?

    will dave ever ask teh commi

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •