Give Sam time.

[GARNETT]

Q. With Reid and Demel fit, Nolan and Tomkins available and Carroll 100% fit will we be a better side ?

I believe so.

[OZHAMMER]

Q. With Reid and Demel fit, Nolan and Tomkins available and Carroll 100% fit will we be a better side ?

I believe so.

get vaz te in for jarvis, and we'll have a team that will push into the top half of the table.

surely you jest about nolan, alf?

[GARNETT]

Q. With Reid and Demel fit, Nolan and Tomkins available and Carroll 100% fit will we be a better side ?

I believe so.

get vaz te in for jarvis, and we'll have a team that will push into the top half of the table.

surely you jest about nolan, alf?[/quote]

No, I believe he would benefit from Carroll being fit, anyway its all about squad not a starting 11, he gives us another option, horses for courses and all that.

[Simone]

I know Sam Allardyce is fat, ugly, useless unattractive, hoof ball, the devil incarnate etc but the players must take some responsibility for the sh1te dished up. Some of them have been fu(king useless fair play!!!

[OZHAMMER]

Q. With Reid and Demel fit, Nolan and Tomkins available and Carroll 100% fit will we be a better side ?

I believe so.

get vaz te in for jarvis, and we'll have a team that will push into the top half of the table.

surely you jest about nolan, alf?[/quote]

No, I believe he would benefit from Carroll being fit, anyway its all about squad not a starting 11, he gives us another option, horses for courses and all that.[/quote]

well if that is how you are looking at it, then i don't disagree.

i think ravel has given us more in attack than nolan... if only he was a little more consistent. i guess that will come with time, but we need it sooner rather than later.

[clsb]

Q. With Reid and Demel fit, Nolan and Tomkins available and Carroll 100% fit will we be a better side ?

I believe so.

get vaz te in for jarvis, and we'll have a team that will push into the top half of the table.

surely you jest about nolan, alf?[/quote]


No, I believe he would benefit from Carroll being fit, anyway its all about squad not a starting 11, he gives us another option, horses for courses and all that.[/quote]

well if that is how you are looking at it, then i don't disagree.

i think ravel has given us more in attack than nolan... if only he was a little more consistent. i guess that will come with time, but we need it sooner rather than later.[/quote]

It's laughable that people are even talking about Nolan being back in the side. He is one of the laziest players I have seen in a

[GARNETT]

Q. With Reid and Demel fit, Nolan and Tomkins available and Carroll 100% fit will we be a better side ?

I believe so.

get vaz te in for jarvis, and we'll have a team that will push into the top half of the table.

surely you jest about nolan, alf?[/quote]


No, I believe he would benefit from Carroll being fit, anyway its all about squad not a starting 11, he gives us another option, horses for courses and all that.[/quote]

well if that is how you are looking at it, then i don't disagree.

i think ravel has given us more in attack than nolan... if only he was a little more consistent. i guess that will come with time, but we need it sooner rather than later.[/quote]

It's laughable that people are even talking about Nolan being back in the side. He is o

[hammerwell06]

Q. With Reid and Demel fit, Nolan and Tomkins available and Carroll 100% fit will we be a better side ?

I believe so.

That's nearly a starting 11 anyway . Imo they would all do better as they are now , let alone if they were fit ...

My fear is , will it be enough once they are all fit. ?
I think it might be more than injuries we've got going wrong at the club .

[ironJL]

Ahem...

[OZHAMMER]

Ahem...

you've come to the wrong place if you want your ar$e kissed mate, whether you were right or not!