PDC...

[ror]

Roeder anyone?

[bones]

yes he would mate

i hope you're right

hadn't heard he was unhappy, is there a link?

my youngest son heard it on talksport "a friend of harry redknapp said ".

I bet like me some of the best games of football you've ever watch over whu was when harry was manager and to be honest i couldn't give a flying f-ck what he gets up to away from football,IF he comes home I will be singing "HARRY REDKNAPPS CLARET AND BLUE ARMY" - view external link

[bazwillrun]

all i know is Sam is the whole problem , not the solution in any way or form, but who to take over ?

Pffft , I havent got a clue, PDC in theory but in practice dont think hed even last the season end with our owners.

maybe a caretaker is the answer

And 'Arry, stated yesterday on sky i think it was, that he really doesnt know where the bookies got their info from, he said they must make it all up, and said categorically he wasnt coming to WHU

however his dog has now issued a statement saying...ruff ruff rff !

[only1salty]

Di Canio in a hearbeat.

One poster on here. "We would go down with fireworks."

Better than going down with a whimper, a dull neck ache of a whimper at that.

Bookies don't always get it right.

We were 10/1 to be relegated after beating Spurs 3-0.

[WHU]

bones and salty

good points

like you bones, mostly enjoyed our viewing times with redknapp

[Eggerts_Ears]

We would go down with fireworks.

What does this actually mean? If we went down with PDC in charge, it would mean that we are still losing most weeks and not playing great.

You'd enjoy that would you?

If PDC came in, and as at Sunderland, failed, not one of you would be saying "at least we had some fireworks."

He'd be getting the right royal (unting and the board would be the target now for appointing a man clearly not up to the job.

[palerider]

We would go down with fireworks.

What does this actually mean? If we went down with PDC in charge, it would mean that we are still losing most weeks and not playing great.

You'd enjoy that would you?

If PDC came in, and as at Sunderland, failed, not one of you would be saying "at least we had some fireworks."

He'd be getting the right royal (unting and the board would be the target now for appointing a man clearly not up to the job.[/quote]

The way I see it is not really wanting PDC. Just not wanting Allardyce.

Could the football possibly be as bad ?

[only1salty]

We would go down with fireworks.

What does this actually mean? If we went down with PDC in charge, it would mean that we are still losing most weeks and not playing great.

You'd enjoy that would you?

If PDC came in, and as at Sunderland, failed, not one of you would be saying "at least we had some fireworks."

He'd be getting the right royal (unting and the board would be the target now for appointing a man clearly not up to the job.[/quote]

Yes I would.

I would enjoy having a manager who gave a sh!t
I would enjoy watching a team that tackled and harassed the opposition, regardless of ability

But most of all I would enjoy the atmosphere of being up for games, of walking to the ground with anticipation of what might happen.

So we lose. So what?

We have lost plenty in the past and we will lose plenty in the future.

It's not the defeat, it's the manner of defeat.

The clu

[WHU]

totally with salty

i think we'd all take redknapp over PDC but that's unlikely

you'd keep allardyce over PDC EE knowing they ain't playing for this manager?

[Eggerts_Ears]

totally with salty

i think we'd all take redknapp over PDC but that's unlikely

you'd keep allardyce over PDC EE knowing they ain't playing for this manager?

I'd rather Roeder.

It's sentimental sh1te, the man is a fu(king lunatic who, in 2 months this season, has already relegated one club.

Great idea, let's bring him here for another 2 months so he can do the same to us. 2 clubs in one season, that would have to be a record.

It's madness, utter madness.

Redknapp is another matter.