It's happening again...

[MrNipples]

Ach, we'll just come back again.

possibly but its gets even harder, the fans have been fleeced already recently so less to get again, suppliers who stood by rangers after liquidation will be doubtful to do it again, will be advance payment terms for all or the shortest terms possible, everything gets harder sponsorship etc[/quote]

How can you say the fans have been fleeced? Only yesterday a fan that put in 25K sold his 2.5 million 1p shares and 'walked away' with A?500,000 profit.

[BertrandRussell]

Shut up, rev.

[BertrandRussell]

How can you say the fans have been fleeced? Only yesterday a fan that put in 25K sold his 2.5 million 1p shares and 'walked away' with A?500,000 profit.

If you think that Hughes bloke is a Rangers fan then you're dafter than rev.

[Sporting_Abeergut]

Ach, we'll just come back again.

possibly but its gets even harder, the fans have been fleeced already recently so less to get again, suppliers who stood by rangers after liquidation will be doubtful to do it again, will be advance payment terms for all or the shortest terms possible, everything gets harder sponsorship etc[/quote]

How can you say the fans have been fleeced? Only yesterday a fan that put in 25K sold his 2.5 million 1p shares and 'walked away' with A?500,000 profit.[/quote]

Only the privileged few were able to buy those shares at 1p, and they definitely weren't "fans". Normal fans (and investors) bought in at 70p or whatever it was. Fleeced.

[MrNipples]

How can you say the fans have been fleeced? Only yesterday a fan that put in 25K sold his 2.5 million 1p shares and 'walked away' with A?500,000 profit.

If you think that Hughes bloke is a Rangers fan then you're dafter than rev.[/quote]



Edit to add: The irony is, this spiv broke cover first and sold his shares for 24p, 2.5 million - way more than have ever been sold so far - yet the price bounced back to 28p. I can't reconcile it myself. The other spivs must be waiting in the wings. - view external link

[Sporting_Abeergut]

if a football club continues as the same football club which rangers claim to do, but are constantly changing the company that runs them, getting into debt and getting it wiped clean post liquidation.

surely that is cheating if they continue to know and make it happen, the club is guilty then, not just the newco/oldco/nextco.

rangers would be feked for creditors if they hit admin again, the banks will give them fek all and they will have fek all to fall back on if they hot a cash flow problem.

and the sfa are gulity for letting the same club fleece more creditors. not as if they dont know whats going on this time.

If they liquidate again, they won't be given a league license and will, effectively, be f*cked.
Very pleasing.

More likely they'll enter administration but i wonder if they'll sell iBroke to pay off some of the creditors? If we have a whip round we can see the f*ckers off for ever

[IanAberdon]

Well I for one hope that Sevco continue on their chosen path - they're doing a braw job, & them's the facts.

[BertrandRussell]

Mr Hughes is an associate of Charles Green.

[MrNipples]

if a football club continues as the same football club which rangers claim to do, but are constantly changing the company that runs them, getting into debt and getting it wiped clean post liquidation.

surely that is cheating if they continue to know and make it happen, the club is guilty then, not just the newco/oldco/nextco.

rangers would be feked for creditors if they hit admin again, the banks will give them fek all and they will have fek all to fall back on if they hot a cash flow problem.

and the sfa are gulity for letting the same club fleece more creditors. not as if they dont know whats going on this time.

If they liquidate again, they won't be given a league license and will, effectively, be f*cked.
Very pleasing.

More likely they'll enter administration but i wonder if they'll sell iBroke to pay off some of the creditors? If we have a whip round we can see the

[happytim]

the sfa have already made enough up to keep the pretense of having a rangers club exist, so why would they change.

rangers could go up and down the leagues like yoyos for decades after countless liquidations and still no pay thier fekin debts, while the sfa would turn a blind eye and the bunmedia would complain how no ones helping rangers get back on thier feet.