+ Visit Scotland Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 87

Thread: Administration in all but name

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    6,541

    re: Administration in all but name

    Quote Originally Posted by BertrandRussell
    The club has too many idiots in the support. They are used to being subservient and towing the party line and can't seem to shake this attitude, no matter what is happening at the club.

    It's incredibly frustrating.


    P!ss off, you were one of the biggest "WATP" type posters on here over the years.

    Suck it up.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    11,578

    re: Administration in all but name

    Wonderful news and it makes the crass Murray's statement (which the daft H***!) lapped up even better today..."For every £5 Celtic spend, we will spend £10"...welcome to the real world of living within your means.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    5,439

    re: Administration in all but name

    Quote Originally Posted by BertrandRussell
    If someone has admitted they are basically in administration they could be trading while technically insolvent. That means the directors could get done for fraudulent trading, which means serious jail time.
    That would cheer me up a bit.[/quote]

    Listen, if Craig Whyte didn't do time I doubt Stockbridge or the rest will. They're far too clever to be caught out like that. Those guys know how to ream a company and get away with it. It's less slippery less sleekit folk that get in bother

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    13,166

    re: Administration in all but name

    Quote Originally Posted by redscot
    The club has too many idiots in the support. They are used to being subservient and towing the party line and can't seem to shake this attitude, no matter what is happening at the club.

    It's incredibly frustrating.


    P!ss off, you were one of the biggest "WATP" type posters on here over the years.

    Suck it up. [/quote]Bertie loves a good flip-flop.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    14,234

    re: Administration in all but name

    have to admire wolands honesty.

    its what everyone else has been saying for along time.

    why the rest of the rangers support wont see things the same way, i find strange.

    the statement about rangers fans being subservient hits the nail on the head.

    ive felt for well over a decade that rangers fans have no sense of reality. they sapped in everything murray and the media told them.

    one rangers fan quoted to me in april 2012 "were to big to let die" which implies it was somebody elses doing. wolands right, too many thickos in rangers support.

  6. #26

    re: Administration in all but name

    I heard the players have rejected a 15% wage cut.

    It's all our fault again!

    Sevco (IA) are a funny wee team...

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    12,876

    re: Administration in all but name

    The WATP stuff was more to wind up Tims than anything else. Of course you are going to be triumphalist when your club is winning (and you are unaware of impending financial doom).

    The Tims and indeed football itself are the least of our worries now.

    I'm talking about people who still maintain this mentality, despite the club's current predicament.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    13,166

    re: Administration in all but name

    BBC confirm the wage cut proposals were rejected. Shame

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    12,876

    re: Administration in all but name

    That was confirmed at 5pm.

    Titanic etc...

  10. #30

    re: Administration in all but name

    Quote Originally Posted by BertrandRussell
    I would say Murray and Whyte should take the majority of the blame for the previous administration.
    Maybe directly but it was always there for all the fans to see yet nothing was said - by anyone. No-one questioned anything, ever cos well weer rah peepil so we are byrawaybigman.

    May i speak on behalf of every non-Rangers fan in the world in saying that i hope the club get pulled through the wringer and don't come out the other side.
    If my club had just been born out of another club that had been liquidated then started handing out A?5k - A?10k a week contracts just to win the lowest Scottish division i'd have been screaming as loud as i could against it. Ra peepil just lapped it up

Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •