
Originally Posted by
CTMilller
I'm OK with the name but I think we could have come up with something that was a bit more obviously representative of the town. While there is the connection with the old New York neighbourhood of Rotherham, this is pretty obscure for most people and there are no links with the US city. (Rotherham was geographically within the diocese of York and the name is based purely on that religious association, as far as I can tell.)
To me it smacks of opportunism and seems completely disingenuous to attempt to trade off the New York City connection. (The myth of the NYC fire hydrants being manufactured in Rotherham was a nice try but, like everything else that attempts to make this link, now seems like what it really is - a transparent fabrication.)
Sorry, I know I sound like a grumpy old man!