if ashly sells what would you most want

[Jammy89]

feck of you tool

its short for your name
just like steve is short for steophen

just looking for an argument you are you fooljog on and ruin another board if you dont want to enter into the toipc debate

No it's not.

His name is T O O S L at the start, which means the shortened would be Toosl, but i suspect you knew that.

So you are name calling and i suspect trying to provoke another argument so you can act all innocent and injured party.

He has also answered your question, at no point has it even been said you can't insult the prick that owns us. You i seem to recall called Rafa "Fat", Mitro was "Mistertrick" both could be deemed insulting.

Any thread about Ashley will become an anti Ashley thread because apart from you and Ghost he has no supporters.

In regards to your question I'd say B but i'm a fan of Zip's answer.

[toptoon]

I´d like A of course (if it was a Man City type owner)

But, due to the financial risk these days (doing a Leeds), like Tanya, it would be best to have someting between B. and A (but primarily B.)

[Curian]

Realistically B. Not sure we would get a D

[Sclox]

A combination of the 3. Its not either or, it can't be.

My choice, if pushed would be mainly option b but with the caveat of an occasional marquee signing to improve the team when the time is right - you know, a 20 to 30 million striker to help push the team into the top 7 when the manager uses his experience and knowledge to recommend it. Investment, obviously wouldn't need to be on the City or Man U level but an effort or signal of intent to climb the table and improve year on year is essential.

It doesn't necessarily have to be a different owner, I would be quite happy if Ashley himself did this.

[Nufc204mag]

a consortium/buyer who will throw millions at the team and place us in huge debt, but for a few seasons there will be loads of plastics wearing the black and white shirts as we do well and myabe win something

b
a buyer who would want to make us a steady ship spend enough to keep us reasonably competitive and develop local talent from youth up to first team

c
not bothered as long as its not ashly

Just someone with more ambition than Ashley will do, doesn't have to spend millions and millions of his own money every season. As long as it's enough to challenge the top 8 of the prem and break our transfer record a few times.

[bix01]

Two avoidable relegations though - JFK then McClaren - who else would've employed either of those two? Plus the near miss with Carver of course...