O/T:- The CV19 Legacy

[magpie_mania]

The poor who have to go to work often on insecure contracts are going to get poorer. The keyboard bound middle classes are going to escape the worst of it while actually saving money.
The public sector will cruise through this, the private sector will be in real trouble in some sectors.
Amazon, Ebay, Twitter, Google , Facebook and Apple will become more powerful, our local home grown tax base will get hammered.
I don't blame the government for trying it's best to save the lives of the elderly and vulnerable, it's the opposite of the cliched heartless Tory narrative but the cost to our under 40s is disproportionately high and if this goes on its going to hit them for years to come.

'but the cost to our under 40s is disproportionately high'

Are you saying that more should have just been allowed to die then? Except it's not just the elderly and vulnerable. Try telling that to my friend in his 50's, no underlying issues, working for the ambulance service. Well he was but now he's in HDU.

There are already too many who have died, but if these measures hadn't been taken I hate to think where we would have been.

Incidentally, what would have been a proportionate cost in number of lives?

[BigFatPie]

One of my main sources of pride in my teaching days was when a pupil learned a new word and applied it successfully. Well done for achieving the learning part, Mr Serious,now we have to work on the application element.

Surely PebbleCrusherPie scores -10 marks for seemingly replying to a post that was in his head rather than the one that was written?

[optipez]

'but the cost to our under 40s is disproportionately high'

Are you saying that more should have just been allowed to die then? Except it's not just the elderly and vulnerable. Try telling that to my friend in his 50's, no underlying issues, working for the ambulance service. Well he was but now he's in HDU.

There are already too many who have died, but if these measures hadn't been taken I hate to think where we would have been.

Incidentally, what would have been a proportionate cost in number of lives?

No that isn't what I was saying, the post was in relation to the thread title, the legacy of Covid 19 it was entirely about the financial cost. I stated clearly that I didn't blame the government for doing what they're doing, unlike quite a few on here I support them. Impossible choices for people to have to make.
Before you get on your moral high horse and go finger wagging remember , everyone has skin in this game. I have elderly parents and children, I worry for them all but have watched my children already pay socially, educationally and financially while my parents have lost far less.
The young ( under 30) have been fantastic in helping their fellows despite having a really small risk of dying themselves.
I hope your friend recovers, I hope everyone recovers.

[navypie]

1. Rid the planet of the scourge of Trump and Trumpism
2. Bring China 'to the table' and create fairer terms of global trade
3. Create a world that respects the Earth and all the creatures that dwell on it

China have been brought to the table, they're at all the high tables of world office.
In return they're responsible for around two thirds of industrial espionage, the majority of illegal poaching of endangered species is done to provide them with aphrodisiacs and bogus health cures.
They're the world's biggest polluters and by far the biggest coal burners.
They execute prisoners to order for body parts, ( Isreal had to pass a law stopping its citizens getting transplants in China when it realised how the organs were obtained).
It's repressed followers of various religions, up to 1 1/2 million Muslims , Christians and the Phallongong.
They've constantly depressed their currency to aid exports.
They've moved into Africa as little more than colonialists.
And of course, Covid 19 is entirely their gift to the world. Hubei province was quarantined from the rest of China yet didn't close its airports to international travel. They knew what they were doing.
Their figures for Covid 19 were and are blatant lies that handicapped the rest of the world trying to deal with this.

But hey, Trump is the scourge.

1.....Stop underfunding the NHS, pay the staff the money they deserve and put an end to health tourism once and for all. You use our service, you fcukin pay for it.
2....Instead of having to import a workforce because our lot have become over-reliant on the welfare state, stop benefits if the idle gits get off their fat arses.
3....Stop paying footballers millions. Even bang ordinary ones are paid a fortune. On that "Project Restart". I can understand players' concerns but for fcuk sake, nurses, posties, bin men, the list goes on are putting their lives on the line every day and they don't work in the controlled environment the players will be in. The nation needs hope, get out there and give us some you namby bamby lot.

Good post optipez, sid tried some backtracking but it didn't wash with me.

[magpie_mania]

No that isn't what I was saying, the post was in relation to the thread title, the legacy of Covid 19 it was entirely about the financial cost. I stated clearly that I didn't blame the government for doing what they're doing, unlike quite a few on here I support them. Impossible choices for people to have to make.
Before you get on your moral high horse and go finger wagging remember , everyone has skin in this game. I have elderly parents and children, I worry for them all but have watched my children already pay socially, educationally and financially while my parents have lost far less.
The young ( under 30) have been fantastic in helping their fellows despite having a really small risk of dying themselves.
I hope your friend recovers, I hope everyone recovers.

Fair enough, the legacy of Covid-19 won't be only financial, it will also be in lives lost which is the angle I was coming from.

The cost to the younger ones will be to a large extent financial for a large proportion of that age group (some will do ok from it but I don't begrudge them as long as they are not profiteering) and to the older generation in loss of life, but to a much smaller number. I guess that is what you mean and I am sorry if I have misunderstood.I

Such difficult decisions to make. Almost impossible to get it right. I am with the Government as I believe that although they have made mistakes and not been totally honest with test numbers they are getting on top of it.

[legs77]

1.....Stop underfunding the NHS, pay the staff the money they deserve and put an end to health tourism once and for all. You use our service, you fcukin pay for it.
2....Instead of having to import a workforce because our lot have become over-reliant on the welfare state, stop benefits if the idle gits get off their fat arses.
3....Stop paying footballers millions. Even bang ordinary ones are paid a fortune. On that "Project Restart". I can understand players' concerns but for fcuk sake, nurses, posties, bin men, the list goes on are putting their lives on the line every day and they don't work in the controlled environment the players will be in. The nation needs hope, get out there and give us some you namby bamby lot.

Good post optipez, sid tried some backtracking but it didn't wash with me.

Agree with all of that.

[navypie]

The poor who have to go to work often on insecure contracts are going to get poorer. The keyboard bound middle classes are going to escape the worst of it while actually saving money.
The public sector will cruise through this, the private sector will be in real trouble in some sectors.
Amazon, Ebay, Twitter, Google , Facebook and Apple will become more powerful, our local home grown tax base will get hammered.
I don't blame the government for trying it's best to save the lives of the elderly and vulnerable, it's the opposite of the cliched heartless Tory narrative but the cost to our under 40s is disproportionately high and if this goes on its going to hit them for years to come.

Fair enough, the legacy of Covid-19 won't be only financial, it will also be in lives lost which is the angle I was coming from.

The cost to the younger ones will be to a large extent financial for a large proportion of that age group (some will do ok from it but I don't begrudge them as long as they are not profiteering) and to the older generation in loss of life, but to a much smaller number. I guess that is what you mean and I am sorry if I have misunderstood.I

Such difficult decisions to make. Almost impossible to get it right. I am with the Government as I believe that although they have made mistakes and not been totally honest with test numbers they are getting on top of it.

It's not abandoning our ode folk, it's doing the best we can but more importantly, giving our young uns a future.

[seriouspie]

One of my main sources of pride in my teaching days was when a pupil learned a new word and applied it successfully. Well done for achieving the learning part, Mr Serious,now we have to work on the application element.

Well let's see shall we?

You are correct to assume I had to look up the word 'schadenfreude' as frankly I did not know it's meaning. As I understand it the word means 'One getting pleasure from another's misfortune'. Used as a noun, what I posted made sense to me. As a Left wing nit picking Socialist, seemingly self appointed to give advice on the written word, your diction at times is shocking. A tiny example being there should have been no comma after the word 'part'. Better English would have been - " Well done for achieving the learning part Mr Serious, we now have to work on the application element".

[drillerpie]

Well let's see shall we?

You are correct to assume I had to look up the word 'schadenfreude' as frankly I did not know it's meaning. As I understand it the word means 'One getting pleasure from another's misfortune'. Used as a noun, what I posted made sense to me. As a Left wing nit picking Socialist, seemingly self appointed to give advice on the written word, your diction at times is shocking. A tiny example being there should have been no comma after the word 'part'. Better English would have been - " Well done for achieving the learning part Mr Serious, we now have to work on the application element".

If we're really going to turn this into a punctuation seminar (because this is a question of punctuation, not diction) I'll go with: "Well done for achieving the learning part, Mr Serious. We now have to work on the application element."

With that out the way, do you have an opinion on the topic (apart from 'lefties can **** off')?

[MAD_MAGPIE]

... for the future, GP surgeries retain the telephone triage system to prevent time wasters visiting with broken finger nails; and cutting out the Friday/Saturday farce in A&E having to deal with self inflicted conditions of drink/drug overdoses. There, that solves SOME of the financial waste in the NHS.

I fully agree and can subscribe to this. I think the GP triage system is certainly something that can be adopted going forward as a suitable method for general practices and the NHS to operate.

As you say it can filter out the time wasters and also reduce the need for clogging up surgery waiting rooms.

I would also like to thrown in video appointments to this mix as well. As part of the GP triage system for consultations that might require a verbal discussion or visual review only and not physical examinations they could be useful in establishing further if a consultation and a trip to surgery is required.

So then you only go to the surgery if the GP thinks they need you to come in to be examined.

The same applies to A&E with the NHS 111 line. That too could operate on the same basis with triage GP’s offering telephone and video calls as a filtering process. Then you go to A&E on the recommendation and advice of the triage GP or if you have called 999 and you arrive in an ambulance.

Other CV19 legacy’s are the instant environment aspects and benefits it has brought. We have seen vast improvements in air quality and pollution levels in towns and cities globally have dropped overnight that would have taken years if not decades to adopt. Mankinds use of oil over the past 100 years has been colossal and it has been treated like oxygen yet we have proven our reliance on it was merely addiction.

In fact a vast reduction of the use of oil and reducing air pollution globally probably never would have happened certainly in this century.

The transport industry would suffer initially but if we are to live in a greener and cleaner world post Covid 19 we need to consider in the future how we reduce our carbon footprint below what it’s been before Covid19 and whether we can reduce business travel and work from home more and have video meetings. Or we move very quickly to less polluting ways of moving around by road, air and sea.