+ Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 38

Thread: Can the beautiful game get uglier than this?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    168
    Quote Originally Posted by sidders View Post
    According to Record Sport, Messi has agreed financial terms on a five-year contract worth a total of €700m (£623m).

    The incredible deal would make the Argentine the highest-paid individual in the history of the sport.

    It equates to £14,200 an hour, £341,000 per day, £2.4m every week and a whopping £10.4m per month.

    Messi is set to spend three seasons at the Etihad before joining City Football Group's (CFG) Major League Soccer side New York City FC for two years.

    How obscene is this payout for a 33 year old footballer when across the same city an international player is fronting an initiative to ensure that youngsters have enough food on their plate?
    Think that's a misunderstanding Sid. 700m is the trigger amount in his current contract. l.e. a figure that they knew would never be met but needs to be there for legal reasons. Especially when he is a free agent next year. Is it coincidence it's the same figure or has somebody got the wrong end of the stick?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,718
    Sports washing at its finest.

    If they had any brains they would go for Mbappe far better value but its all about being Billy Big Bollox.

    I'm sure all the others will be totally fine if he earns those wages.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    13,571
    Quote Originally Posted by legs77 View Post
    Sports washing at its finest.

    If they had any brains they would go for Mbappe far better value but its all about being Billy Big Bollox.

    I'm sure all the others will be totally fine if he earns those wages.
    Ironically I think there's a lot of sentiment involved in this, with Messi and Guardiola wanting to link up again, but I agree if you're going to spend huge money like that and be the biggest and most successful team for the next decade, invest in the young wonderkid, not the ageing maestro.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    35,953
    Quote Originally Posted by jackal2 View Post
    Ironically I think there's a lot of sentiment involved in this, with Messi and Guardiola wanting to link up again, but I agree if you're going to spend huge money like that and be the biggest and most successful team for the next decade, invest in the young wonderkid, not the ageing maestro.
    Shuuusshhh. We need to keep Cal Roberts as long as we can.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    13,571
    Quote Originally Posted by Elite_Pie View Post
    Shuuusshhh. We need to keep Cal Roberts as long as we can.
    God God yes! What was I thinking?

    Swale, quick, delete my earlier post. I wish to make it clear that big clubs should NOT look for young wonderkids and should stick to recruiting 33-year-old Argentinian football geniuses.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    6,937
    Quote Originally Posted by sidders View Post
    According to Record Sport, Messi has agreed financial terms on a five-year contract worth a total of €700m (£623m).

    The incredible deal would make the Argentine the highest-paid individual in the history of the sport.

    It equates to £14,200 an hour, £341,000 per day, £2.4m every week and a whopping £10.4m per month.

    Messi is set to spend three seasons at the Etihad before joining City Football Group's (CFG) Major League Soccer side New York City FC for two years.

    How obscene is this payout for a 33 year old footballer when across the same city an international player is fronting an initiative to ensure that youngsters have enough food on their plate?
    On those wages a 45% tax rate contribution to the HMRC coffers would be £4.68m a month or £56.2m a year and would be more or less a pound for every person in England with a population of 55.9 million at the last count. All from one person.

    I’m not advocating the grotesque salary, merely highlighting that almost half of a top footballers wages in this country is a tax contribution. That should help this country look after the less fortunate and poor. It just shows football at the highest level is it’s own economy completely separated to the real world.
    Last edited by MAD_MAGPIE; 02-09-2020 at 07:05 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,718
    Quote Originally Posted by MAD_MAGPIE View Post
    On those wages a 45% tax rate contribution to the HMRC coffers would be £4.68m a month or £56.2m a year and would be more or less a pound for every person in England with a population of 55.9 million at the last count. All from one person.

    I’m not advocating the grotesque salary, merely highlighting that almost half of a top footballers wages in this country is a tax contribution. That should help this country look after the less fortunate and poor. It just shows football at the highest level is it’s own economy completely separated to the real world.
    In an ideal world yes but the rich clearly don’t pay their full taxes.

    It was only a few months back they were done for FFP can’t see them saying he earns £1m a week it will be hidden and as he is a tax dodger he will know exactly how to hide it with some creative accounting.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    9,728
    Quote Originally Posted by tripie View Post
    Is it coincidence it's the same figure or has somebody got the wrong end of the stick?
    No, they've quoted that as salary but have either made it up, or are just guessing.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,535
    Why does this thread carry the O/T:- prefix? I could understand if it was posted on a politics message board.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    24,779
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeekay56 View Post
    Why does this thread carry the O/T:- prefix? I could understand if it was posted on a politics message board.
    Good point - fixed.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •