O/T Clarkson.

[Scum-Triumphant]

They're not looking for a lower profile though, a lower profile means less money.

It’s not what they are looking for but it is what they should be given.
8 pages of the daily mail dedicated to them on Monday.
As far as I can see Wooton and Morgan spend airtime every day on them and now Clarkson has jumped on the band wagon.

Who said the worst thing about being spiken about is not being spoken about?

They are like spoilt children yearning attention and these goons are daft enough to give it to them.

[crashbang]

Hmm sounds like you want press censorship

[animallittle3]

The truth of the matter is they wanted to leave the royal family and go their own way and unfortunately for them it's pretty much like The Hotel California .

The means to earn a living outside of royalty whilst remaining anonymous is just a practical impossibility .

What I mean is that the levels of security they need needs paying for and doesn't come cheap I'd imagine .

The only means to earn a living is to do the things they are doing which comes with the price of not achieving the quieter life .

Absolutely trapped and whilst I'm no royalist my human side has a great deal of sympathy for the couple .

I suspect before too long it's going to take its toll on the couple and they'll probably split .

[Scum-Triumphant]

Hmm sounds like you want press censorship

On what? There is literally nothing else to report on them. There was an article a few days ago on what colour Kate wore and whether it was to piss off H&M.
The bottom of the barrell has been scraped.

I’ve seen Game Of Thrones so I don’t think Clarkson removing his plagiarised idea is censorship.

Edit
I also said earlier that I don’t think he should’ve pulled the article and stood by it. That’s the opposite of censorship.

[crashbang]

On what? There is literally nothing else to report on them. There was an article a few days ago on what colour Kate wore and whether it was to piss off H&M.
The bottom of the barrell has been scraped.

I’ve seen Game Of Thrones so I don’t think Clarkson removing his plagiarised idea is censorship.

Edit
I also said earlier that I don’t think he should’ve pulled the article and stood by it. That’s the opposite of censorship.

How can he pull an article that was published in his column in the press.
He has stood by it, has there been an apology? No.

[Scum-Triumphant]

How can he pull an article that was published in his column in the press.
He has stood by it, has there been an apology? No.

“ And The Sun has now removed the column from its website, saying: "In light of Jeremy Clarkson's tweet he has asked us to take last week's column down."

https://news.sky.com/story/jeremy-cl...nacceptable%22.

[crashbang]

I hope you are not hoping for him to ride off into the sunset. He winds up people, that is his job.
Seems to be working.

[ragingpup]

I hope you are not hoping for him to ride off into the sunset. He winds up people, that is his job.
Seems to be working.

You could say that he is a confectioner of outrage, manipulating anger for the masses.

But is it authentic? Is he genuinely angry and outraged or simply posturing populist stances to manipulate his readers in order to take their cash?

I suspect that he is not the angry one, that his readers are the ones left outraged, punching furiously and impotently at their keyboards.

Why should he ride off into te sunset? Kerchingggg...

Clever chap indeed.

[Scum-Triumphant]

I hope you are not hoping for him to ride off into the sunset. He winds up people, that is his job.
Seems to be working.

I’d prefer him to do the opposite and stand by what he says.

Saying sommat original again would be good as well. I like him on who wants to be a millionaire And I’m looking forward to more of the farm programme.

Not sure where I have suggested that I’d like him to disappear.
I’m just disappointed that he’s jumped on a bandwagon and then expressed regret instead of coming up with something original like he usually does.

I prefer the Jeremy Clarkson that punched piers Morgan. Not the one that wants to follow him.

[crashbang]

You could say that he is a confectioner of outrage, manipulating anger for the masses.

But is it authentic? Is he genuinely angry and outraged or simply posturing populist stances to manipulate his readers in order to take their cash?

I suspect that he is not the angry one, that his readers are the ones left outraged, punching furiously and impotently at their keyboards.

Why should he ride off into te sunset? Kerchingggg...

Clever chap indeed.

Top gear kerching
Grand tour kerching
Farm kerching
Who wants to be kerching.

Must be Yorkshire oaf.