|
| + Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
I've always felt home crowds can intimidate officials into making decisions, sometimes to the point it backfires when you get a fearless ref doing the away team a favour to make a point. I never thought refs were biased in terms of favouring bigger clubs though until our first game back in the top flight in 1992 at Old Trafford. We deserved to lose that game by more than the final score of 2-0, but some of the ref's decisions that afternoon were an absolute joke and that set the tone for much of that season. Could be that Warnock had already got himself a reputation by then, but more likely a case of us being naive as to how to deal with and take advantage of top level officiating on a week to week basis.
So at no point have you answered the question about arrogance.
You go on about understanding football… you look at all the incidents you list through rose tinted glasses with an unobstructed view from the stands. Have you ever ref’d a game? I’d implore you too, it’s an eye opener.
Ultimately a referee gives what he/she sees… some decisions may be emotive. Sometimes a ref will overrule the assistant referee, ultimately it’s their decision. That’s not arrogance but the interpretation of the laws of the game of one individual over another.
Has anyone ever seen this chap at a Notts game? (watching).
Refs at lower levels will be mindful of assessors and what that means for their personal progress whilst those higher up won't enjoy being shamed in public by pundits pointing out their mistakes on TV replays, but what about 50/50 decisions? I suppose a good ref would try to even things out in such cases, but the close call incidents would offer refs the opportunity to impose bias with plausibility denial.
It's also probably fair to assume that a small number of refs can reach a level where they *feel* they are untouchable and *could* get away with decisions that other refs wouldn't, especially if they are sat in a room looking at a screen making or overruling a decision and not having to face walking towards supporters and an angry bench at the final whistle. Worse still, VAR officials can deflect at least some of the blame onto the ref on the field by calling him over to look at the screen. It's rare they go against VAR and stick to their original decision, feeling under pressure to agree with the disembodied voice in their ear assuming higher authority.
They should fast track retired players into refereeing, especially in professional leagues. They would have an appreciation of the dark arts and more idea of what is and isn't malicious.
If you look at sports football wants to replicate in regards to respect for officials, it isn't hard to find Rugby and Cricket all heavily use former players as officials
I certainly have answered the question but obviously my points of view don't agree with yours !
Regarding you asking if I have ever refereed a game, I can assure that I have refereed many games during 17 years as an official and also played at a good level for more than 20 years too.
In my day it was about fairness , impartially and team work, whereby, the officials worked as a team.
It was never a question of
" look at me, I'm in charge !
The fans want to see a football game not some centre stage whistler.
The bench mark being "you never noticed a good referee."
The modern era clones could learn from the old timers regarding positioning for a start and the "assistants" in particular are also often incorrectly positioned.
At all levels of the game they line up directly in line with the last defender !
It is ,therefore, impossible to see the Left Winger for ( example ) through a defender's body. Being a yard goal side gives that view !
No VAR to correct the decision outside the Premiership is there.?
P.s. I hope your officiating was of a better standard than your typing ?
Last edited by SinceSept1959; 12-11-2024 at 07:56 PM. Reason: Addendum
The biggest question in my mind is; What are his so called 'mates' doing throwing him under the bus like that?
He obviously thought that saying this stuff wouldn't have any repercussions cos he trusted them.
They're the bad guys in my opinion.
It was filmed years ago, so I'd guess it's one of two scenarios - A fall out among those directly involved and it's an act of revenge (over an affair or something like that) or it's got shared on trust with another friend who's then shared it with another friend or chat group and it's got leaked to the media by somebody who doesn't even know him.
Going slightly off topic, that incident should have led to Coote missing a week and Oliver missing the rest of the season. The latter has gone from being pretty much our best ref to being absolutely useless (which still puts him near the top of our lamentable collection). I don't think that Ten Hag wouldn't have survived in any case but in another scenario (Ten Hag being less rubbish) it may have been the call that pushed him over the edge. Unforgiveable.