+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: Another Refereeing gaff.......did this cost Villa a place in the Champions League?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    4,913
    Quote Originally Posted by GlennMiller View Post
    Ronners - it's an interesting point about when a Ref should blow for full time. To my knowledge, Refs are given some leeway to wait until an attack concludes before blowing the whistle. This always seems incongruous to me as once time is up, surely it should be up? A few seasons ago at NYS, I recall the Ref taking this rule to the extreme and letting play continue as long as it took the Owls to score - 11 minutes I think!!

    Brin - you're correct - it was a shocking decision!
    Yes Glenn I also remember that late late owls goal, and yes I do think referees are given some leeway regarding when to blow for full time. Back in the 70's with the incident with Clive Thomas and Brazil in the world Cup, we as supporters never knew how much longer over the 90 were going to be played, it was just down to the referee, whereas now we get to know the minimum time that can be played as when announced time added on we are always told a minimum of, and then the minutes. I don't mind too much the allowing of letting an attack continue to the conclusion of a match, yes its frustrating if your team are ahead or level and the other team are attacking, and it's over the time put up, but it's very frustrating when a referee has blown for time if it's your team on the attack trying to get either a winner or a leveller and some referees still do that too. UTM

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2023
    Posts
    490
    I've always thought that there should be an independent time-keeper, as in rugby league at football league level. Surely Refs have enough to worry about, without players telling them when the game should end?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    4,913
    Quote Originally Posted by Jocksgloves1 View Post
    I've always thought that there should be an independent time-keeper, as in rugby league at football league level. Surely Refs have enough to worry about, without players telling them when the game should end?
    I do agree that an independent timekeeper would benefit the game Jocks, as they are all wired up and could talk to one another. Sometimes at the end of games I think the referee takes it to the extreme of allowing attacks to carry on and even allowing one or more corners to be taken well after the initial finish time. In rugby union when the whistle, or hooter, sounds, the game then stops, and finishes, when the ball next goes out of play. UTM

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 25-05-2025, 06:00 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-05-2025, 01:50 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-05-2025, 09:50 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 19-04-2025, 03:00 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-03-2025, 01:50 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •