Can you name anyone removed or murdered by Trump for disliking him? Err, what are you talking about?
Did the nazis round up people and.....deport them?
Err, yes they did, by the trainload, in their millions (you dispute this?), across all of the countries they occupied during WWII. Where they were deported to turned out to be a series of industrial-scale killing factories, set up with the aim of furthering the aims of their creators, the German Nazi Party (see below for definition of Nazism)
Secure borders is NOT facist or nazi style.
- Has anyone (me included) suggested that it is?
Criminals jailed is NOT facist or nazi style.
- Ditto for the secure borders question
Deporting illegals is NOT facist or nazi style.
- And again, but lets understand who is deemed illegal and what due process has been used to establish the states right to deport them
Right to bear arms is NOT facist or nazi style.
Irrelevant, given the situation in the UK (please see below for comment out disarming
Free speech is NOT facist or nazi style.
Quite so, very much agree but who determines what is free speech? Your constitution attempts to do so, but as with all government legislature and the underpinnings it depends on, interpretation is everything, beauty is in the eye of the beholder in all things.
Women's right to privacy is NOT facist or nazi style.
Again, very much agree and I suspect this comment relates to the debate on trans rights, something all countries are struggling with, including the USA and the UK
Fair competition is NOT facist or nazi style.
Define fair competition? As an example take specialist UK steel, imported by the US for use in your nuclear submarine construction for the US Navy, and up to February, tariff free. Since March this year that changed, and UK steel is now subject to a 25% tariff. It might be worth bearing in mind that the steel Im talking about CANNOT be made in the US, you dont have the technology, so any suggestion that it was dumped on the US is clearly wrong. Trump hasnt got the faintest idea as to how complex world economics work, he is incapable of understanding that his deals damage all parties (the steel used by those constructing US Navy submarines now HAVE to pay 25% more for their steel, which goes to the US Treasury, guess where it goes from there!
But....and here's the left for you....
Forced "vaccines" is facist/nazi style.
I presume you are pointing at the UK there? Not ONE SINGLE person in the UK has EVER been forced to accept vaccine administration. That applies to ALL vaccines, now and historically. You will not find any evidence of such practice because it doesnt exist. Try, by all means. What CAN be found is the disasterous effect that vaccine nay-sayers such as Andrew Wakefield and others more recently such as Kennedy, on the VOLUNTARY take-up of vaccines here in the UK (and elsewhere), leading to the return as a major public health issue of Measles, Whooping cough, Polio, Diptheria, Mumps, and Chickenpox (amongst others) all of which were almost unheard of until the vaccination misinformation machine went into overdrive during Covid.
Disarming the population is facist/nazi style.
Again, aiming (forgive the pun) at the UK? You cant disarm those who are not armed, and in the UK the civilian population are NOT (with some very limited exceptions) armed, nor have they been armed in past 200 years or so, with one exception during WWII when the dads army became the formalised Home Guard. The Guard was disbanded shortly after WWII ended and all arms handed in for disposal. Fortunately the rule of law here is enforced by a largely unarmed police force. Specially trained officers are issued with a variety of lethal weapons, and equally fortunately, the absence of widespread armed civilians makes it much easier for those officers to tell the good guys from the not so good ones. There are no groups demanding that the policy should change, largely because we can see what happens when the right to bear arms is acted upon. We value the lives of our children too much to allow anything of the sort to happen.
Political prosecutions is facist/nazi style.
Agreed, and thats exactly what we are seeing across the US where the DoJ is being used to prosecute those who Trump doesnt like now, or who may have transgressed against him in the past
Intel agencies politicised is facist/nazi style.
Amen, and please examine all those who are heading major organs of government including the FBI
Forced acceptance is facist/nazi style.
- Forced acceptance of what? If you want an example of (potential) forced acceptance look at the stance Trump is taking on the war in Ukraine, where he seems to be favouring a halt to hostilities based on current front lines, which if translated into a long term peace deal, would mean that nearly 20% of Ukraine would be FORCED to become Russia (not including the Crimean peninsula illegally annexed by Russia in 2014)
Political opponents on lists is facist/nazi style.
And Trump has plenty of lists
Restricted speech is facist/nazi style.
Restricted by? Again u are perhaps referring to the UK? As I mentioned in another post on the subject, I am fairly certain that I can say or do anything I like unless its inciting violence (Which I think is a reasonable limit, you dont?). I might end up in a fight if someone really takes offence, but thats a risk you take if you espouse controversial, sometimes upsetting opinions, something we all have to bear in mind.
If Trump was a nazi or facist how come de Niro etc are not rotting in prison?
I have no idea what you are referring to so I cant answer.
I really dont know what you are talking about when you utter such garbage as the liars in my group-think. Ive said on many occasions in the past that I form my opinions and views for myself, I use CREDIBLE sources of information, not click-bait and all the sh1te that infests the web, unlike some. I dont need influencers or those with vested interests in a particular outcome to do that.
Couple of definitions/descriptions, since you suggested I don't know them;
Nazism
Nazism (or more correctly neo-nazism), is a form of fascism with an extreme ultranationalism, based on social Darwinism and pseudo-scientific racial theories, which proposed that certain races were superior
Nazism holds that society should aspire to a "master race" and aims to create a racially homogeneous society by excluding and persecuting those deemed "inferior" or "community aliens.
The ideology supports a dictatorial leader and a totalitarian state, dismantling liberal democracy and parliamentary systems. Trump is rapidly emulating the achievements of Adolf Hitler ruling as a dictator with absolute power.
Fascism
Fascism fosters the notion of A single, centralized autocracy led by a dictator who holds supreme power, often seizing control forcefully or by dismantling democratic institutions. Ultranationalism is a key characteristic with exclusionary form of nationalism as a core principle, placing the importance of the nation above all else. This can involve the concept of a "master race" and the demonization of minorities. Fascism embraces paramilitarism and the idea that the nation is strengthened through military power and national unity. Opposition, dissent, and criticism are suppressed through violence and oppression to maintain control. The state exerts strong control over social and economic life, and individual interests are subordinated to the state's will. Fascism is fundamentally opposed to democracy, liberalism, pluralism, and individual rights.
Those two sound familiar?

Reply With Quote
