Match Thread vs. Barnet 08.02.22 [NL]

[upthemaggies]

Average attendance comparisons between this season and the pre-lockdowns season

Premier League
2019/20 - 29.821
2021/22 - 39.393

Championship
2019/20 - 14.949
2021/22 - 16.290

League One
2019/20 - 8.802
2021/22 - 9.604

League Two
2019/20 - 4.687
2021/22 - 4.645

National League
2019/20 - 2.174
2021/22 - 3.017 *This figure does not include the first few weeks' attendances


So these figures would suggest the 1,700 increase at Meadow Lane this season is largely due to a post lockdown factor. Doing away with the frustrating football under Ardley will have probably contributed, but to a lesser extent.

[magpie_mania]

He's had an absolute shocker, definitely at fault for 3, possibly 4.

Please be careful in your posts.

There will be those who come on here later and say that the only reason we won was that they had a dodgy keeper.

Don't feed them!

[laddo]

Just giving a balanced not biased view on what I saw m_m.

Obviously I realise that I saw the online highlights showing the goals multiple times and with the addition of a slow motion reply, so can't judge the goalkeeper as well as someone sat watching in the ground in real time.

A combination of match reports fr my trusted sauces in the ground and comments on NCM it can be summarised as we could have scored 9-12 goals albeit 3-4 were the GK fault and Barnet scored 1 but could have scored 3-4.

3 points.

[countygump]

[ncfcog]

Stats now up . . . https://www.nottscountystats.com/pos...ch-31-barnet-h

[KintoreMagpie]

Please be careful in your posts.

There will be those who come on here later and say that the only reason we won was that they had a dodgy keeper.

Don't feed them!

Goalie at fault for the first 4 goals and, in my opinion, could have done so much better with the 5th and 6th goals. Notts only had 9 attempts on target so a 66.67% hit rate is v fortuitous. 5 corners compared to Barnet’s 8 in the match and I also recall listening to the commentary that 15 seconds into the second half Barnet missed a sitter which would have made it 3-1 and game v much on. Clearly Notts were lucky to win.

Happy with that MM 👍

[laddo]

God bless Lady Luck.

[magpie_mania]

Goalie at fault for the first 4 goals and, in my opinion, could have done so much better with the 5th and 6th goals. Notts only had 9 attempts on target so a 66.67% hit rate is v fortuitous. 5 corners compared to Barnet’s 8 in the match and I also recall listening to the commentary that 15 seconds into the second half Barnet missed a sitter which would have made it 3-1 and game v much on. Clearly Notts were lucky to win.

Happy with that MM 👍

That will do nicely.

Thanks 👍