F P S share proposal

[BCram]

The poster was abusive to me and Islay (OK, can maybe understand that part of it), tried to rewrite history by stating I voted against the FPS takeover and that I hate FPS and also made threats of violence toward the current DFCSS board members saying they would meet them but it 'wouldn't be nice'. I think you were right to ban but also believe in freedom of speech so agree you should let the poster back. I will complain again if I receive more abuse, am lied about or if more threats of violence are posted though.

Jist so's ye ken.

Measured response Deeranged. Think the core is don't be personally abusive. I read Taintedice's posts and thought that they read as very OTT and quite obviously wrong on occasions. I think that it is really difficult to do banter on a forum. You miss the facial expressions and the tone of voice which play such a part in letting the person that you are chatting to, see you are teasing etc

Hopefully Taintedice will find a way to post his views without adding personal insults. Islay got back, even I got back after being banned on here, so Taintedice should fit in quite well!

[islaydarkblue]

Measured response Deeranged. Think the core is don't be personally abusive. I read Taintedice's posts and thought that they read as very OTT and quite obviously wrong on occasions. I think that it is really difficult to do banter on a forum. You miss the facial expressions and the tone of voice which play such a part in letting the person that you are chatting to, see you are teasing etc

Hopefully Taintedice will find a way to post his views without adding personal insults. Islay got back, even I got back after being banned on here, so Taintedice should fit in quite well!

To date I have never been banned on this forum.

[shaded]

it was more the "it would be messy"or similar that can be interpretated in a few different ways,any way he will be back once footymad recall him

best just to draw a line under it imo,people agree he should be back so he will be

[Deeranged]

it was more the "it would be messy"or similar that can be interpretated in a few different ways,any way he will be back once footymad recall him

best just to draw a line under it imo,people agree he should be back so he will be

Absolutely Shaded.

[jdfc]

The poster was abusive to me and Islay (OK, can maybe understand that part of it), tried to rewrite history by stating I voted against the FPS takeover and that I hate FPS and also made threats of violence toward the current DFCSS board members saying they would meet them but it 'wouldn't be nice'. I think you were right to ban but also believe in freedom of speech so agree you should let the poster back. I will complain again if I receive more abuse, am lied about or if more threats of violence are posted though.

Jist so's ye ken.

Why does saying something won’t be nice mean violence, he might of meant verbal exchanges wouldn’t be nice, at know time was a square go mentioned

[Deeranged]

Why does saying something won’t be nice mean violence, he might of meant verbal exchanges wouldn’t be nice, at know time was a square go mentioned

All about the situation in which the words were used and thereby the implication.

[BCram]

Ban was temporary.

Shaded is trying to lift.

There isn't too much disagreement in the middle ground with posters on here, I think hmacs post clarify things without point scoring.

I [B]think your understanding ain't far off mine.

[/B

Funny isn't it how people mature as they get older and wiser! You'll soon be asking for age concessions.

[Returnofrros]

If hmac had not stirred up the past there would have been no need for me to post on this topic.

That's *******s

[Returnofrros]

If hmac had not stirred up the past there would have been no need for me to post on this topic.

Your first post on this topic was post 8, hmac did not get involved till later.

[hmac]

At least Ian Bodie was prepared to resign and not just sit in the boardroom and Directors Box waiting to see how things were going to pan out.
If I did not agree with the route that a committee was taking I would resign rather than just go along with their decision.

What decision?

If everyone took that line nobody would be there to fight for survival.