+ Visit Derby County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 32 of 90 FirstFirst ... 2230313233344282 ... LastLast
Results 311 to 320 of 1002

Thread: Careless Tories!

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    8,450
    Quote Originally Posted by ramAnag View Post
    I cannot see how her comments were anti-Semitic however...perhaps you could explain.
    I cannot believe I just read that

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    15,658
    Quote Originally Posted by Geoff Parkstone View Post
    I cannot believe I just read that
    Well perhaps you could explain instead/as well.

    I take your point GP, about it being a (very) safe Labour seat...however she hasn’t just held it has she? She’s repeatedly increased her already huge majority.
    Last edited by ramAnag; 24-04-2023 at 09:15 AM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    15,658
    Quote Originally Posted by ramAnag View Post
    Well perhaps you could explain instead/as well.

    I take your point GP, about it being a (very) safe Labour seat...however she hasn’t just held it has she? She’s repeatedly increased her already huge majority.
    Actually that’s not quite correct and I apologise. Her majority was slightly reduced in 2019 but she still had over 70% of the vote.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    9,105
    Quote Originally Posted by Geoff Parkstone View Post
    I cannot believe I just read that
    RA angling for a late career change into politics

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    8,450
    Quote Originally Posted by ramAnag View Post
    On the other hand...an MP’s first responsibility is, imo, to his/her constituents and judging by her repeatedly huge majority Diane Abbott’s seem more than satisfied with her
    I take it that you've never been to Hackney North or Stoke Newington? It's one of the classical "pig in a blue/red rosettes" seats. It has returned a labour MP every election since the constituency was created in 1951. Abbott holding it is not a reflection of her performance, Abbott losing it would be (not that that has ever been likely)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    9,538
    Weird statement from our resident Mathematician in Westminster. She wrote that Irish, Jewish and Traveller people "undoubtedly experience prejudice", which she said is "similar to racism". Judaism is a religion, not a race so, technically, she is correct that is similar to, but isn't, racism. Traveller people, also known, amongst others as Gypsies and Roma, might be viewed as a race so anything "anti" them probably IS racist rather than "similar to". Are the Irish a race or are they part of the Caucasian race? Not sure whether words/actions that are anti Irish are racist.

    Just where do you draw the line? Authorities seem to believe that anything anti Israeli political policy is racist. Not a view I share. What do you see as a race? It's all rather confusing.

    What I am sure of is this latest faux pas demonstrates again, as if it was necessary, that Diane Abbott isn't fit to be a Minister in HMG.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    9,105
    Quote Originally Posted by ramAnag View Post
    an MP’s first responsibility is, imo, to his/her constituents and judging by her repeatedly huge majority Diane Abbott’s seem more than satisfied with her.
    …and a role model/person of influence, and imagine a constituency where the word is out that non-black prejudice doesn’t exist/ doesn’t matter

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    15,658
    No idea what #366 means...guess you’re ‘just joshing’.

    Glad you’ve cottoned on to the ‘role model/person of influence’ thing. Should help you understand why people feel so strongly about the likes of Raab, Williamson and Johnson...but back to Abbott...she didn’t actually suggest that ‘non-black prejudice doesn’t exist/doesn’t matter’ did she? She just sought to differentiate between the racism which black people experience and other forms of prejudice.
    I’m not sure why...I think it was ill judged but while the usual triumvirate on here, along of course with the Daily Mail, are criticising, only MA has made any sense and no one has explained how what she’s said is anti Semitic.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    8,450
    As a point of interest, I believe that it is now generally held that the original Jews were in fact very dark skinned and indeed the bloke they nailed up was also similarly pigmented.

    Let's just cite this for now: https://siris-libraries.si.edu/ipac2...0001~!786641!0. That the Smithsonian, Tricky.

    So it's a very fine line whether her thoughts were racist or anti semitic or both. Can you be prejudiced against a black person because of their religion, but still not be racist in so doing? Take the example of American black people who follow Islam for comparison - do they suffer from race hate or religious hate, or both.

    This leads on to an intriguing philosophical question of whether a black person can be racist towards another black person? Was, for instance the Rwandan civil war between Hutu and Tutsi a race war? One of the causes was cited as being related to "how African are you"

    Anyway I digress from the specific to the general, so I will await feedback for deviation, but I do find it an interesting direction of thought.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    15,658
    Quote Originally Posted by Geoff Parkstone View Post
    As a point of interest, I believe that it is now generally held that the original Jews were in fact very dark skinned and indeed the bloke they nailed up was also similarly pigmented.

    Let's just cite this for now: https://siris-libraries.si.edu/ipac2...0001~!786641!0. That the Smithsonian, Tricky.

    So it's a very fine line whether her thoughts were racist or anti semitic or both. Can you be prejudiced against a black person because of their religion, but still not be racist in so doing? Take the example of American black people who follow Islam for comparison - do they suffer from race hate or religious hate, or both.

    This leads on to an intriguing philosophical question of whether a black person can be racist towards another black person? Was, for instance the Rwandan civil war between Hutu and Tutsi a race war? One of the causes was cited as being related to "how African are you"

    Anyway I digress from the specific to the general, so I will await feedback for deviation, but I do find it an interesting direction of thought.
    Interesting though it may be...it doesn’t seem to clarify how the contents of Abbott’s letter were ‘anti Semitic’.

Page 32 of 90 FirstFirst ... 2230313233344282 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •