+ Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 32 of 108 FirstFirst ... 2230313233344282 ... LastLast
Results 311 to 320 of 1254

Thread: O/T:- Trump Presidency 2.0 [hic sunt dracones]

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2024
    Posts
    1,004
    Quote Originally Posted by drillerpie View Post
    Yes, sure. That's easy to prove, which is why I called it a much softer claim.

    His original claim was that Canada can import most of their goods to the US tariff free, while the US has to pay large tariffs to export to Canada. When I said I didn't think that was true, he gave me some articles about milk subsidies, something about New Zealand, nothing about the actual claim he made, and then did a victory lap.

    If it turns out I'm wrong and Lullapie is right, and Canada can (now could) sell in the USA tariff free while the USA has to pay large tariffs to sell in Canada, my next question is what that says about Trump's deal making skills, seeing as he renegotiated US-Canada trade in his first term.

    So basically Lullapie has to either admit that he just makes things up, or admit that Trump negotiated a terrible deal. Judging by his posts, neither of those things come very easy to him, so expect more bluff and bluster / personal stuff in his next post.
    There are numerous cases in that list regarding 'lumber' so that's one area where there's been an imbalance and in fact, Trump mentioned that specifically along with cars.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    1,606
    Quote Originally Posted by drillerpie View Post
    I'm not going to reply in kind with personal comments and so on, but I'm afraid I am going to insist on you proving the claim you made.

    Your claim was that Canada can import most of their goods to the US tariff free, while the US has to pay large tariffs to export to Canada.

    As I said before, the articles you posted as supposed proof do not in any way support the claim you made.

    If among all your bluff and bluster you would like to walk back that claim and change it to the much softer claim of 'other countries apart from the USA use tariffs' or 'Canada is involved in trade disputes with other countries' as seems possible from your last post, just say that clearly.
    Boring???.zzzzzzz

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    1,606
    Quote Originally Posted by drillerpie View Post
    Yes, sure. That's easy to prove, which is why I called it a much softer claim.

    His original claim was that Canada can import most of their goods to the US tariff free, while the US has to pay large tariffs to export to Canada. When I said I didn't think that was true, he gave me some articles about milk subsidies, something about New Zealand, nothing about the actual claim he made, and then did a victory lap.

    If it turns out I'm wrong and Lullapie is right, and Canada can (now could) sell in the USA tariff free while the USA has to pay large tariffs to sell in Canada, my next question is what that says about Trump's deal making skills, seeing as he renegotiated US-Canada trade in his first term.

    So basically Lullapie has to either admit that he just makes things up, or admit that Trump negotiated a terrible deal. Judging by his posts, neither of those things come very easy to him, so expect more bluff and bluster / personal stuff in his next post.
    You seem to have been asleep at your keyboard for the last four years. There was a guy in power called Joe Biden.

    Are you blaming Trump for trade agreements made while he wasn?t in power?

    Seriously you make the most deluded rants. You ask for proof from others and when they supply it, you say that you can?t be bothered to read it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    9,976
    Quote Originally Posted by Lullapie View Post
    You seem to have been asleep at your keyboard for the last four years. There was a guy in power called Joe Biden.

    Are you blaming Trump for trade agreements made while he wasn?t in power?

    Seriously you make the most deluded rants. You ask for proof from others and when they supply it, you say that you can?t be bothered to read it.
    One of the many friends and people he?s apparently always talking to and agreeing with him should have told this bloke that President Rapist negotiated and signed the last North American trade deal.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit...nada_Agreement

    My own personal theory is that Trump and his cronies are using this tariff nonsense to distract from the nefarious sh!t that Musk and his cronies are doing to take effective control of government.

    https://x.com/wired/status/1886181066651947499?s=46

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    8,729
    Quote Originally Posted by BigFatPie View Post
    One of the many friends and people he?s apparently always talking to and agreeing with him should have told this bloke that President Rapist negotiated and signed the last North American trade deal.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit...nada_Agreement

    My own personal theory is that Trump and his cronies are using this tariff nonsense to distract from the nefarious sh!t that Musk and his cronies are doing to take effective control of government.

    https://x.com/wired/status/1886181066651947499?s=46
    I thought part of his mandate at DOGE was to modernise federal tech infrastructure and processes. He's literally been asked to do this by the president, who recently won a landslide victory. Not sure how all that plays into the idea that he's taking control of or "infiltrating" the government.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    1,606
    Quote Originally Posted by slack_pie View Post
    I thought part of his mandate at DOGE was to modernise federal tech infrastructure and processes. He's literally been asked to do this by the president, who recently won a landslide victory. Not sure how all that plays into the idea that he's taking control of or "infiltrating" the government.
    Apparently he's saving the US taxpayer approximately US$4 billion a day. Important news for those that care about government wastage, but an opportunity for those to moan that like spending other peoples' money .
    Last edited by Lullapie; 04-02-2025 at 12:06 AM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Posts
    1,393
    Quote Originally Posted by Lullapie View Post
    Apparently he's saving the US taxpayer approximately US$4 billion a day. Important news for those that care about government wastage, but an opportunity for those to moan that like spending other peoples' money.
    Any evidence for that figure? That would be about 1.5 trillion a year saved already, a claim I find to be vaguely preposterous.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    1,606
    Looks like after all his blustering and bravado and a call to arms of the 'Canadian people', Justin Trudeau, after a conversation with Trump this morning, is softening his 'stance' toward Trump and the US.

    He's just announced that Canada will appoint a high-positioned individual to help prevent Fentanyl going across the border and also implement a border plan costing US$1.3 billion.

    The last of the Klaus Schwab world leaders has backed down after only a day.

    They don't like it up 'em.
    Last edited by Lullapie; 04-02-2025 at 12:16 AM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,953
    Quote Originally Posted by ThePieWhoCameIn View Post
    What were you hoping for from the implementation? A lot of claims were made before the referendum about what Brexit could be like and some of them contradicted each other, so there was no way everyone was going to be happy.

    Boris was elected to get Brexit done, and signed off the deal. Would you rather someone else had handled it?
    ***
    Recent years have shown the truth that we have a poor quality set of MP's, of most persuasions. Boris is a flaky chancer and couldn't bring together a team worthy of the name to negotiate an effective exit deal.
    The first step should always have been to get out of the control pf the ECJ and it's appendage the ECHR both worthwhile when set in place in the 1950's but currently not fit for purpose other than to allow lawyers to line their pockets and prop up both the UK and EC establishments.
    Freedom to do what you want is worth the price of getting away from EU and UK establishment controls.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2024
    Posts
    1,004
    Quote Originally Posted by TheBlackHorse View Post
    ***
    Recent years have shown the truth that we have a poor quality set of MP's, of most persuasions. Boris is a flaky chancer and couldn't bring together a team worthy of the name to negotiate an effective exit deal.
    The first step should always have been to get out of the control pf the ECJ and it's appendage the ECHR both worthwhile when set in place in the 1950's but currently not fit for purpose other than to allow lawyers to line their pockets and prop up both the UK and EC establishments.
    Freedom to do what you want is worth the price of getting away from EU and UK establishment controls.
    Excellent post.

Page 32 of 108 FirstFirst ... 2230313233344282 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •