We would differ on religion, yes, but that's ok, not a problem to me.
As for being pro-Ardley, I try to be pro-Notts, with the manager being part of that. I don't like everything he does, it's just that at the moment, I don't think we are far off where we need to be but I do think that if we do not go up, we need a new manager next season. Some would say that I am easily pleased!
It's all water off a ducks back to me and snide comments, little nicknames are fine by me. When someone has to resort to direct abusive language or goes too personal then they have already lost the argument or whatever they are debating.
Makes them look weak.
Personally I will never drop to that low a level as it's simply not needed. I will leave that to others
I was wondering about the use of "toxic" too. How can anyone be poisoned by posts they don't like? You can usually see where a fred is going, if you don't like it don't be so precious and faint, just don't follow it. Not every one descends into a slanging match, in fact most disagreements just fade away without any fatalities.
i used the word toxic, im not a linguist so there is likely a more fitting word but the enviroment i.e. the engagement and exchanging of viewpoints in here i find involves significant drama and fighting, where personal battles often harm the ability to find anything insightful about matches/players performance.
I wouldn't categorise my not posting or viewing the board regularly as being precious, its just not enjoyable wading through what i outlined above so i dont do it as much as i used too.
The player rating threads are usually ok but not commented on very much and are the threads i would look at when i do come on. A pet hate of mine is seeing a thread with 25 replies when there was 5 the last time i was on and thinking there might be something worth reading only to find 20 replies with puns...
What a comeback this was. 2 goals in injury time!
You Pies!