+ Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 35 of 48 FirstFirst ... 25333435363745 ... LastLast
Results 341 to 350 of 568

Thread: O/T:- Vaccines: Pro/Anti & Conspiracy Theories [Originally Covid Pass and Meadow Ln.]

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    18,551
    Quote Originally Posted by cher1 View Post
    Bugger, I wasn't going to reply again. Sorry everyone
    I did warn you a couple of days ago.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    9,976
    Conclusion from a study published in Nature magazine last week;

    ‘Whilst myocarditis can be life-threatening, most vaccine-associated myocarditis events have been mild and self-limiting22. The risk observed here is small and confined to the 7-day period following vaccination, whereas the lifetime risk of morbidity and mortality following SARS-CoV-2 infection is substantial. Indeed, myocardial injury is very common in persons admitted to hospital with SARS-CoV-2 infection26, when evaluated systematically using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin tests27. Moreover, evidence of myocardial injury, irrespective of whether due to myocarditis or myocardial ischemia, is associated with a higher risk of in-hospital death28. We estimate that the absolute number of excess myocarditis events in the 28 days following a first dose of adenovirus or mRNA vaccine is between one and six per million persons vaccinated, and the excess risk following the second dose of the mRNA-1283 vaccine is ten per million. By contrast, we estimate 40 excess myocarditis events per million in the 28 days following SARS-CoV-2 infection. The risks are more evenly balanced in younger persons aged up to 40 years, where we estimated the excess in myocarditis events following SARS-CoV-2 infection to be 10 per million with the excess following a second dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine being 15 per million. Further research is required to understand why the risk of myocarditis seems to be higher following mRNA-1273 vaccine. Although the wider societal benefits of controlling the spread of virus to those who are more vulnerable are substantial, these data may help inform public health policy and the choice of vaccine offered to younger adults.’

    Fairly clear cut.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    24,769
    Quote Originally Posted by BigFatPie View Post
    Conclusion from a study published in Nature magazine last week;

    ‘Whilst myocarditis can be life-threatening, most vaccine-associated myocarditis events have been mild and self-limiting22. The risk observed here is small and confined to the 7-day period following vaccination, whereas the lifetime risk of morbidity and mortality following SARS-CoV-2 infection is substantial. Indeed, myocardial injury is very common in persons admitted to hospital with SARS-CoV-2 infection26, when evaluated systematically using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin tests27. Moreover, evidence of myocardial injury, irrespective of whether due to myocarditis or myocardial ischemia, is associated with a higher risk of in-hospital death28. We estimate that the absolute number of excess myocarditis events in the 28 days following a first dose of adenovirus or mRNA vaccine is between one and six per million persons vaccinated, and the excess risk following the second dose of the mRNA-1283 vaccine is ten per million. By contrast, we estimate 40 excess myocarditis events per million in the 28 days following SARS-CoV-2 infection. The risks are more evenly balanced in younger persons aged up to 40 years, where we estimated the excess in myocarditis events following SARS-CoV-2 infection to be 10 per million with the excess following a second dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine being 15 per million. Further research is required to understand why the risk of myocarditis seems to be higher following mRNA-1273 vaccine. Although the wider societal benefits of controlling the spread of virus to those who are more vulnerable are substantial, these data may help inform public health policy and the choice of vaccine offered to younger adults.’

    Fairly clear cut.
    Ah but they would say that, wouldn't they? I once saw an article in Nature about lizards. I'll leave you to put two and two together.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    9,976
    Quote Originally Posted by SwalePie View Post
    Ah but they would say that, wouldn't they? I once saw an article in Nature about lizards. I'll leave you to put two and two together.
    Haha don’t mention lizards to the anti vax lads, they’ll be claiming soon the vaccines turn you into one.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by sidders View Post
    Apparently 31% of EFL players have not yet had their first shot against COVID and a quarter of players have no intention of getting vaccinated. We could have the ridiculous situation of fans having to produce a vaccine passport to watch players who have not been vaccinated.
    What's a matter with these pillocks? Are they afraid of having a pinprick? Will it get them laughed out of the dressing room?
    Civil liberties are all well and good but this is about protecting your fellow man as well as yourself. Those who reject being vaccinated are behaving like a bunch of right wingers or do they actually believe the Q-anon myth that it's all part of a government plot to control people?
    The way things are going football will have ground to a halt before January is halfway through.
    Maybe they think the vaccine hasn't been tested properly and has been rushed through. Maybe they think that the side effects of the Vaccine have been hidden from the public to suit their gamble of pushing the untested vaccine on them !?.

    Didn't the government retract the law that means any companies involved with the creation of the vaccine cannot be sued for any damages caused by its use ?

    There's is a rumour that one hidden side effect is inflammation of the heart ( I'm not sure how plausible or true ) and I know 3 people who have had heart attack's that the doctors cannot identify what caused it , they could see no reason for them having one (Is this normal?)
    mmmmmm....food for thought possibly

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    8,014
    Quote Originally Posted by PedroTheFisherman66 View Post
    Maybe they think the vaccine hasn't been tested properly and has been rushed through. Maybe they think that the side effects of the Vaccine have been hidden from the public to suit their gamble of pushing the untested vaccine on them !?.

    Didn't the government retract the law that means any companies involved with the creation of the vaccine cannot be sued for any damages caused by its use ?

    There's is a rumour that one hidden side effect is inflammation of the heart ( I'm not sure how plausible or true ) and I know 3 people who have had heart attack's that the doctors cannot identify what caused it , they could see no reason for them having one (Is this normal?)
    mmmmmm....food for thought possibly
    It isn't a rumor, myocarditis is a rare side effect of the vaccine. It's almost always mild or moderate and treatable. It's different from a heart attack though.

    The vaccine isn't untested. Yes, companies have been indemnified against legal action, but the government will pay out instead under a vaccine damage payment programme that was already in place (although the amount of payment is £120k, which doesnt seem much).

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by cher1 View Post
    It isn't a rumor, myocarditis is a rare side effect of the vaccine. It's almost always mild or moderate and treatable. It's different from a heart attack though.

    The vaccine isn't untested. Yes, companies have been indemnified against legal action, but the government will pay out instead under a vaccine damage payment programme that was already in place (although the amount of payment is £120k, which doesnt seem much).
    Is it normal for people to have heart attacks where the doctors cant find a reason for it to happen ,? I'm not sure if this is a normal occurrence or not

  8. #8
    Name:  yj9iyclhfk481(1).jpg
Views: 234
Size:  18.3 KB

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    24,769
    Quote Originally Posted by tied_up_in_notts View Post
    Name:  yj9iyclhfk481(1).jpg
Views: 234
Size:  18.3 KB

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    5,355
    I’m double jabbed and have been pro-vax.
    However, recently I’ve started researching for myself rather than just accepting what is being constantly rammed down my throat. There’s plenty of medical professionals that are against the vaccine, they’re just constantly shut down and get zero air time. The main issue they have isn’t that the vax is altering our DNA, or anything wacky, just that the true side effects aren’t known but the numbers of younger people suffering heart problems is much greater than what’s being reported. The argument to that is every product comes with a risk, but that is exactly there argument. If you’re going to take paracetamol, the risks, however small, are detailed. You’re free to read them and then free to decide whether you take the paracetamol. However, with the vaccine these side effects are hugely downplayed and the pressure to have it is enormous.
    I’m really not a conspiracy theorist or anything like that, and I have no agenda. But from what I’m starting to read, there’s a real plausible other reason we’re all being bullied into taking a vaccine….Profit!
    If anyone has 3 hours spare. Listen to Joe Rogans podcast with Peter McCullough, recorded this week.

Page 35 of 48 FirstFirst ... 25333435363745 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •