Hearts legal action

[Arabdownsouth]

More details

https://www.eveningtelegraph.co.uk/2...t-says-lawyer/

I can't read it all without subscription 😟

[Shedboy1971]

I can't read it all without subscription ��

use private viewing that gets round it - what browser you use?

[tHeArAb]

Or search for the article in Google and use the Google link.

[Arabdownsouth]

Cheers lads, I looked it up on Google. Good argument on our side I'd say and one that should render the voting issue worthless I hope.

[tHeArAb]

So basically, we're going for a technicality. Seems like a bit of a risk if you ask me. I'm sure Hearts explained why they went to court instead of the SFA arbitrary. I can't remember what exactly their reason was however.

[Shedboy1971]

not impressed that the judge questioned that it was maybe too late now for sfa arbitration - wtaf - showing sides early doors? Good response though about the months wait to take legal action. This aint a court or legal matter really but law is an ass at times.

[Arabknight]

I think it was because they were challenging the ruling made by SFA and therefore they cld not arbitrate. Or something like that.

[Shedboy1971]

I think it was because they were challenging the ruling made by SFA and therefore they cld not arbitrate. Or something like that.

and they were wrong as it was spfl not sfa

[BudMill90]

I still get the feeling that forced reconstruction is going to be the quickest solution if it transpires that the judge feels they have a case.

[arab777]

Wee snippet

The judge is pointing out to Hearts' advocate that Hearts already contractually agreed to arbitration by joining the SFA, per article 99.1 of the articles of association.