SSBs (a) 25th April SC Quarters

[JJA22flup]

Seriously, we've been doing that on here for years. It's boggling my mind you've just noticed this now.

Yeah I wonder why I've noticed it when someone unjustly removes 2 of my perfectly reasonable threads. I wonder if it was more to do with the fact that it didn't fit in with the narrative on here which seems to be very anti Micky Mellon at times?

[JJA22flup]

Anyway, fun as that was, I have to go to work now. No doubt I'll have a few replies when I get home. 😂

[TerryTheTerror]

Yeah I wonder why I've noticed it when someone unjustly removes 2 of my perfectly reasonable threads. I wonder if it was more to do with the fact that it didn't fit in with the narrative on here which seems to be very anti Micky Mellon at times?

The narrative on here? Seriously, WTAF are you on about now? All narrative is supplied by the posters, if that's what they are saying then that's what they are saying. You are making it sound like the mods are editing the content to get the messages they want out there.

I can categorically deny this is the case, what's posted is posted by the users, even when they are talking ****e.

[GUNBOAT]

Latest Scottish Cup odds.

Hibs 2/1

ST Johnstone 11/4

United 10/3

ST Mirren 4/1

I did think that Hibs and ST Johnstone would head the betting and it will require 2 more performances like Sunday's for us to win it.

[Sande_Man]

Deary me, what a petty reply, that's not what I was saying at all...

Petty is actually submitting a complaint about someone using the term ‘filth’ and then trying desperately to imply that it was sectarian......petty especially since you call the other club scum! Which is exactly the same thing!

[Sande_Man]

Latest Scottish Cup odds.

Hibs 2/1

ST Johnstone 11/4

United 10/3

ST Mirren 4/1

I did think that Hibs and ST Johnstone would head the betting and it will require 2 more performances like Sunday's for us to win it.

Pretty confused why we have shorter odds than St Mirren. The bookies obviously think Hibs are the favourites so with us playing them in the semi then surely St Mirren who are ahead of us in the league should have shorter odds than united?

[JJA22flup]

Petty is actually submitting a complaint about someone using the term ‘filth’ and then trying desperately to imply that it was sectarian......petty especially since you call the other club scum! Which is exactly the same thing!

He called the fans 'filth'. I called the club 'scum'. Entirely different.

[offshore_arab83]

The forum rules are simple, threads that are of same topic are merged, it's been that way for years and wont change. Its easier for readers and of course for moderation purposes if all in same place.

Anyone with any issues regarding that then I'm sorry to say we cant help you on that and if its as big a problem as made out then maybe another forum where multiple threads of the same topic are allowed would suit you better.

Off the top of my head though I cant think of any UTD forum where that happens, not on Tek and not on East so no idea what UTD forum exists that allows that.

[GUNBOAT]

Pretty confused why we have shorter odds than St Mirren. The bookies obviously think Hibs are the favourites so with us playing them in the semi then surely St Mirren who are ahead of us in the league should have shorter odds than united?

I cannie be certain the odds i found are 100% mate,on 2 of the sites they had Kilmarnock at 11/2 4th FAVS and they arnie even in it now.As you will know Scottish football is not taken too seriously by some of the firms.

[tHeArAb]

You're wasting your time mate. One mod decides to judge our threads as boring, even though there were plenty of replies so moves them. Yes I was p1ssed on Sunday night, I wonder why, but I didn't say one thing which was out of order or inflammatory. I sincerely apologise for being really happy with my team's performance for the first time in about 5 years! I'm afraid the new mod obviously thinks it's his place to be judge and jury on this board which is really not what these places should be about and the above 'apology' is negated by the excuses and justifications of his actions.

Plenty of replies? Your "the scum are out thread" had, I think, six replies in three days. Three from Gunboat, two by yourself and one by ADS. The other I'm not sure. Possibly even less.

You don't want the mods to be of judge & jury but you are demanding the Mods ban a certain member. What is it to be?

I also didn't say your threads were boring. Not once. I've said why I merged the threads but if you can't accept that and think it was done for some other reason then that's your issue.

I haven't much else to say on the matter. I think my previous post was fairly clear.

I was stone cold sober on Sunday as i am on most Sundays.I have a pretty physical job and there is no way i would manage work on Monday if i was on it all day Sunday.
You are also wrong to say no one replies to any link i put up as JJ replied to one on Sunday and Teddy Bear has replied to one too on the sub forum.
If you want to tidy the board up and remove me too just tell me and i will F OFF.I am not saying i'm an angel on here but its very rare that i fall out with fellow posters and when i do its normally regarding politics not United.
I have confined my very few political comments on the sub forum as requested and have fallen out with no one on any thread on it.As for baiting Peter you really must be kidding surely?,i get on very well with him and he gives as good as he gets from me on here.

I didn't say anything about you being pissed on Sunday? Listen mate, I don't want anyone to f*ck off and won't be removing anyone, but if you claim I'm spoiling the board for you by my actions then I'm entitled to let you know that your posting style spoils the board for me at times.
You have indeed curtailed your polical posts, as Teddy has his posts about the other arse cheek (despite still taking grief from certain members about it) so well done to you both.
And yes, you do get on with Peter but you do bring his name up a lot which he feels obliged to reply to, or as you put it 'give as good as he gets'. As a result there are board members here who want him banned, and possibly don't post as much themselves, because he's never off this board rising to bait or throwing back wind up comments.