+ Visit Scotland Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 87

Thread: Administration in all but name

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    14,234

    re: Administration in all but name

    woland i have an ex neighbour, still talk to him on occassion and he stated to me the day rangers beat celtic in march 2012, about 6 weeks after they went into administration that rangers have cleared thier debt and murray has money to invest in rangers.

    and he was basically happy about this predicament.

    no mention that rangers had dumped the debt and murray would be putting in hee haw and was the main reason rangers were feked in the first place.

    hes a decent guy, but when he has his rangers head on his brains dont function.

    i find many with the same attitude, i can see how frustrating it can be for folk like you.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    12,876

    re: Administration in all but name

    Quote Originally Posted by Sporting_Abeergut
    Maybe directly but it was always there for all the fans to see yet nothing was said - by anyone. No-one questioned anything, ever cos well weer rah peepil so we are byrawaybigman.
    That's absolute garbage. Lots of fans were questioning Murray long before he bolted and Whyte was never trusted by all supporters. I suppose you have to swallow what you're fed by the press but if you think that cr@p you posted is true, then you're obviously daft.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    11,578

    re: Administration in all but name

    "May i speak on behalf of every non-Rangers fan in the world in saying that i hope the club get pulled through the wringer and don't come out the other side".

    I fully echo those sentiments.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    13,166

    re: Administration in all but name

    Quote Originally Posted by BertrandRussell
    That was confirmed at 5pm.

    Titanic etc...
    I was working, then I went shopping and then I had my tea. Now I'm catching up, if that's ok wi' you, ye demoted (arf arf) fud.

  5. #35

    re: Administration in all but name

    Quote Originally Posted by BertrandRussell
    Maybe directly but it was always there for all the fans to see yet nothing was said - by anyone. No-one questioned anything, ever cos well weer rah peepil so we are byrawaybigman.
    That's absolute garbage. Lots of fans were questioning Murray long before he bolted and Whyte was never trusted by all supporters. I suppose you have to swallow what you're fed by the press but if you think that cr@p you posted is true, then you're obviously daft.[/quote]

    Questioning it down the boozer wie yer mates doesnae count. If anyone actually did question it, they did it with a whisper. Never heard any fans groups say sh1te in Murray's direction.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    12,876

    re: Administration in all but name

    Follow Follow (the main Rangers fanzine) was anti-Murray for a good couple of years before he left.

    You seem clueless.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    14,234

    re: Administration in all but name

    i created several threads on here around 2006-2007 about murray and his lies, and what came back.

    "fek off ya paranoid loon"

    "reves an idiot"

    and other stuff too.

    great to proven correct.

    hindsight is one of my strong points.

    i also seen the downturn in the economy coming which was one of the reasons murrays companies got into huge debt. i seen that come around 2001, and predicted it would happen within 5-10 years. murray didnt see it coming despite warnings from even his own directors whom he bullied into silence.

    murray a businessman, dont make me laugh, hes a gambler.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    5,332

    re: Administration in all but name

    Quote Originally Posted by BertrandRussell
    It's incredibly frustrating.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    2,522

    re: Administration in all but name

    Is the 15% cut just for the players?

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    18,028

    re: Administration in all but name

    I said on here at the start of the 2011-12 season that Rangers would be relegated, and I got called all thes they could think of.

    But I don't like to say "I told you so".

Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •