how much money did the buns spend tae win the diddy title?

[super_ally_rfc]

Super Ally is a hoot, like a dog wee a bone

Pulls someone up for posting if's and but's then replies with the exact same

what are my ifs and buts

i have stated we have enough money to get us through to 2015 with the season ticket money - are you disputing this

i have stated we have investors willing to put money into the club, dave king has stated he is willing to do so, are you disputing this

i have stated the losses in our accounts wont be as bad this year - there are a few one time costs last year that wont be on it this year and indications from the club is that they have cut costs in other areas to

most of you lot were predicting we would be in admin by now and once again you are wrong

[super_ally_rfc]

sally if you think running the club at a level that needs investors putting money in to stave off another admin is sensible then your more stupid than i thought.

ffs take your heed out the sand and wake up and smell the coffee.

in the last 2 seasons, people have taken money out of your club, not put it in, where are these investors you talk about, is it chuckles and whyte.

and you also stated rangers havent cut costs yet, another kamikaze act by sevco.

your relying too much on season ticket money, glad your so confident its coming.

woland is right about your sort ally.

more tedious shyte from you, once we are out of the lower divisions and in the top league again our income will go up as sponsors and season ticket prices increase, the only stupid fud is you thinking the artifical conditions of the last 2 years and next year are in some way indicative of our finances when we are back in the top league

dave king has stated

[happytim]

sally. yous have won a league by a huge margin which suggests the club hasnt cut its spending enough and pays players it dosent need.

dave king has not invested, his willingness to invest, means nought as it has for 2 years, until he does, the indications are that he could be another chuckles, and he wont pass the fit and proper persons test anyway.

and even if he does want to invest, the easdales might tell him to go fek himself.

and next seasons ticket money aint in yet and might not be enough.

yet your looking ahead to being in the top tier.

get your heed back in the sand ally.

[Airdrieman]

Why do they always need a mllionaire behind them?

[Archiebaird]

Why do they always need a mllionaire behind them?

Buying success is the only way they know.

[happytim]

because they cant manage their own accounts.

simple maths they cannot do.

[Airdrieman]

Why do they always need a mllionaire behind them?

Buying success is the only way they know. [/quote]

So, without success, they can't function as a football club?

[DeezAreGood]

Not with McCoist at the helm and with the current board, I could see us taking another 15 point hit for administration.

25 for a second admin.[/quote]

It won't be a second admin, it will be the first.

The Rangers have never been in admin.[/quote]It's the same club according to the authorities, which means they'll have to punish them for a second insolvency event.

[DeezAreGood]

all available evidence indicates that we will cut costs, we will sell roughly the same amount of season tickets and there are investors willing to stick money into the club

I presume this is backed up by the ASA and the ECA, as well as 14 other sources?

[happytim]

the same club/old club argument will hit new heights in the coming weeks should another admin be about to happen.

wouldnt bet against the sfa admitting the rangers were never the same club to start with, just to hit them with a lighter deduction.