Peterborough have Moore bid accepted, according to reports

[Monkey46]

Frustrating situation is this and one I can sympathize with .

By getting him on loan and taking the risk you have made him an attractive acquisition to other clubs , POSSIBLY pushing his value out of your reach .

You've taken the punt on him and because he's scored goals he's attracted interest and a bidding war .

Any chance you guys could have bought him in august instead of the loan ?

I take the point hindsight is a wonderful talent at a football club .

Apparently Barnsley have also entered the arena so that's that lol. UTFM!!!

[dantpen]

So Barry Fry has said that his own chairman might not be happy with the deal???? Thats like Warney going in with a £1m bid without agreeing it with TS. Sounds dodgy to me.

[mellowmiller]

Whats all the fuss about ??? we have just gone on a decent run without him because we have started to play football in a different style. Instead of hoofing the ball up field in a form of direct football relying on Moore we actually now confuse teams and we are a better team for it.

Don't forget before his suspension we couldn't win a game for peanuts because the other teams easily stopped the route one. Let Moore go we can manage without him.

Ball wasn't in the team then so we went route 1 because Moore was our only striker.
You'll never convince me that Yates is a more effective player than Moore so if we don't get Kieffer then I hope we get an alternative powerful striker with goals in his locker.

[mellowmiller]

Apparently Barnsley have also entered the arena so that's that lol. UTFM!!!

Well if that's true, I'd rather he went to Barnsley than another League 1 club.
I'm not convinced he's good enough for the Championship at the moment though.

[animallittle3]

Apparently Barnsley have also entered the arena so that's that lol. UTFM!!!

Hopefully not monkey with all due respect , my thinking is that if he isn't good enough for a competitor than why would he be good enough for ourselves .

Without wanting to sound all Wendy , in the light of changing ownership , substantial profit gained through player sales and given our league position I'm hopeful our recruitment is slightly less risky .

We don't have a stable league position to be speculating this window so much .

Mind you if his name is jumping off the Oakwell spreadsheet then who knows .

[millers88]

Think it's time to give up if we can't complete with Peterborough for a player we have already had on loan. It will also show that all the past supposedly million pound transfer bids for players such as Gregory, May and Bradshaw ect were a load of nonsense.

[Monkey46]

It's the transfer window 88 it's always nonsense lol. UTFM!!!

[animallittle3]

Think it's time to give up if we can't complete with Peterborough for a player we have already had on loan. It will also show that all the past supposedly million pound transfer bids for players such as Gregory, May and Bradshaw ect were a load of nonsense.

You've got to bear in mind Peterborough probably have a substantial war chest with the size of the fees they've gained over the last few years .

[animallittle3]

My thoughts exactly Animal we've been there all too often so I sympathize with RUFC also

Danny Drinkwater was the premium example , still rattles me to this day we didn't buy him there and then instead of the loan from Man Utd .

[caytonmiller]

If our clubs bought every loan player animal we would be out of business. Especially if you have SE incharge