Daniel Stendel

[pass_and_move]

It worrin the club accounts published a few weeks back. Of the £14 million running costs in that year £8 million came from TV income and transfer surpluses, £4 million from ST and matchday ticket income, and £2 million from merchandising and sponsorship..

As a model of future policy then maybe OGC Nice provides a pointer. Fans there are in meltdown and the previous long standing 20% part owner (similar to Cryne position) and the CEO ev resigned this season over Dog keeping £30 million in transfer surpluses and drawing it from the club to pay off part of the loan he took to buy the club. No incoming major transfers ev been sanctioned, particularly strikers desperately sought by Vierra. Nice are now the second lowest scorers in the league. (And Goat ez stepped into the vacant CEO's shoes)

Wi the 20 million they layed art to buy this club I should think itull be a good three or four years afooar more sales of our big hitters like Potts or Bradshaw will begin to pay that back.

Pinnock will be next art followed by whoever tables a bid for the rest of our more talented players.

Once the initial investment is payed back to the consortium through player sales itull be interesting to see what happens to the money if the club turns over a profit, afterall they reiterated that they're here long term

[DOOALI]

Yeah they're here long term milking the club until it runs dry I can't see anything changing long term

[pass_and_move]

Yeah they're here long term milking the club until it runs dry I can't see anything changing long term

Maybe so Dools, time'll tell i guess. Look at it this rooard in relative terms, if tha took art a 100k mortgage tha'd wanna pay it back sooner rather than later wunt tha. These are business men at end ot day, it's ruthless and business is about profit whether we like it or not. Patrick Cryne put in but I believe he took art too.

[bill46]

It worrin the club accounts published a few weeks back. Of the £14 million running costs in that year £8 million came from TV income and transfer surpluses, £4 million from ST and matchday ticket income, and £2 million from merchandising and sponsorship..

As a model of future policy then maybe OGC Nice provides a pointer. Fans there are in meltdown and the previous long standing 20% part owner (similar to Cryne position) and the CEO ev resigned this season over Dog keeping £30 million in transfer surpluses and drawing it from the club to pay off part of the loan he took to buy the club. No incoming major transfers ev been sanctioned, particularly strikers desperately sought by Vierra. Nice are now the second lowest scorers in the league. (And Goat ez stepped into the vacant CEO's shoes)

Your obsession with Nice is strange to say the least.I can't wait for your comments in May if Barnsley get promotion and Nice qualify for Europe.It'll be a reight laugh on here.

[pass_and_move]

Your obsession with Nice is strange to say the least.I can't wait for your comments in May if Barnsley get promotion and Nice qualify for Europe.It'll be a reight laugh on here.

You'd have said both Nice and Barnsleys objectives at the beginning of the season were Europe and promotion respectively. Owt else deemed failure. I don't honestly see both clubs achieving their objectives. Same owners, same ethos and philosophy in place so SB's research into the goings on at Nice are very much relevant in my opinion

[bill46]

You'd have said both Nice and Barnsleys objectives at the beginning of the season were Europe and promotion respectively. Owt else deemed failure. I don't honestly see both clubs achieving their objectives. Same owners, same ethos and philosophy in place so SB's research into the goings on at Nice are very much relevant in my opinion

I haven't mentioned owt about objectives but we seem to be doing alright.As for Nice I don't give a monkeys in fairness.

[animallittle3]

I haven't mentioned owt about objectives but we seem to be doing alright.As for Nice I don't give a monkeys in fairness.

You should given the same owners are in charge here too .

Just because it doesn't suit your agenda doesn't mean you can ignore it .

[pass_and_move]

I haven't mentioned owt about objectives but we seem to be doing alright.As for Nice I don't give a monkeys in fairness.

A know tha dint say owt abart objectives mi owd, that was me talking from a general point of view as in 'YOU'D' (meaning everybody) rather than you personally Bill.

[Ponte_Steve24]

Problem we have is that every man n' his dog knows we're minted.

[SBRed48]

It worrin the club accounts published a few weeks back. Of the £14 million running costs in that year £8 million came from TV income and transfer surpluses, £4 million from ST and matchday ticket income, and £2 million from merchandising and sponsorship..

As a model of future policy then maybe OGC Nice provides a pointer. Fans there are in meltdown and the previous long standing 20% part owner (similar to Cryne position) and the CEO ev resigned this season over Dog keeping £30 million in transfer surpluses and drawing it from the club to pay off part of the loan he took to buy the club. No incoming major transfers ev been sanctioned, particularly strikers desperately sought by Vierra. Nice are now the second lowest scorers in the league. (And Goat ez stepped into the vacant CEO's shoes)

Bill 46,

Thaz "forgotten" to justify thi answer to Dools when tha sed "the club doesn't run on fresh air" suggesting that it wo Dog pumping his own money in. If tha carnt see the link wi Nice then so be it.

(If I wo thee a wud seek professional advice abart thi obsession wi my pooasts. )