These pair of chancers are saying they need the fans now. Pity at least one of them didn’t listen any other time about stadium issues.
![]() |
+ Visit Aberdeen FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Push it back to 2043 means I will never have to look down Merkland Road East and not see a football stadium.
F'uck the s'hitehole in the country.
2033 would probably do it but I don't want to take the chance.
Last edited by donsdaft; 15-05-2019 at 09:29 PM.
These pair of chancers are saying they need the fans now. Pity at least one of them didn’t listen any other time about stadium issues.
Did Hibs go through all this palaver when they did up Easter Road or did they just get on with it?
So the pant pishers are asking the club questions? That's good because the happy clappers would just sit back and let the Huns, Celtic, Milne and anyone else ride us up and down the street whilst telling us Hibs and Hearts fans are better than us. The grumbles go beyond here and other social media platforms. Otherwise the club wouldn't give a ****.
Saltire said their sponsorship would take them up till the stadium is finished so that would be 2023 then?
None of this utter utter b0llocks would have anything to do with poor season ticket sales would it?
I agree with all redscot says.
Nevertheless, there has been a realisation at board level that fans are pissed off, unlikely to buy into DNA long term and that the projected rise in income from the move to Easter Alford has to be funded by bums on seats for which there is no evidence. “Challenger brand” is pish, as many of the banks who started the terminology have found out (they changed to fintech so lots of scope for copywriters to come up with a fitba equivalent) but it’s the first acknowledgement that the future depends on wide community support not a ‘we know best’ edict from the board. Any statement which pushes the message that a whole organisation is behind something is usually a confirmation that it is completely split which mirrors the view in the support about the stadium.
It’s easy to dismiss as a “we’re listening” PR puff but there was never any serious attempt in the past to suggest there was any listening going on at all so I would at least give this a cautious welcome.
The Head of Communication's signature is illegible.
I haven't read the document. It would depress me.
AND ... they have arranged the signatures in alphabetical order of first names.
That does it. I'm off. No going back.
I feel its all just Lip Service until they actually sit down and ask EVERY season ticket holder and fan what they actually want and what their preference is.
The way things are going, there will be a lot less season ticket holders to ask next season if they continue ignoring the fans like they have been up to now.
It's like Brexit to me, a complete smoke screen, with the people in charge just saying whatever they want to suit their own agendas and fvck everyone else.
I really hope to fvck Kingsford doesn't happen and we redevelop Pittodrie. Yes I know it costs more blah blah blah, but how much publicity would it be for a company to step in and help out doing this?
We could then rename it in their honour but actually stay where the majority (of the fans I know) want to stay.
We then have a win win, brand new training facility and stay where we are. Pipe dream? Maybe, but thats my preference.