Originally Posted by
the_anticlough
Yes, Austin is a better crosser but there are other important points to consider which still make Nemane the better bet out wide.
- defenders and coaches hate being beaten by pace and penetrated more than anything else, it gives defences the jitters and spreads nerves and doubt
- the chaos caused can lead to anything, even if the cross gets blocked
- AN poses a big threat for defenders to get yellow and red cards
- the fear of his pace pins them back and the deeper line decompresses play and gives us more space to play our dominant possession game
If you offer an opposition coach the chance to face Austin over Nemane, they'd snap our hands off 'yes, I'll have some of that' even if his crosses are better.
And as the great Richie Benaud used to say 'think of what your opponent least wants you do, then do that'