
Originally Posted by
KerrAvon
In simple terms, a person is entitled to use reasonable force in all the circumstances in self-defence.
A quick hypothetical for you in light of your comments: - a bloke approaches you in the street who appears to have a beef with you. He's aggressive and says, 'I'm going to stab you up you c*nt' and reaches into his pocket.
On the basis of your post, would you think: 'Well, he's being very aggressive said he'd stab me, but he's put his hand in his pocket, so there's no problem'?
I don't think that you would.
And suppose you decided to hit him on the basis that you feared he was reaching for a knife, would you then think 'well he might be tooled up, but he's on the floor now, so all is well with the world'.
I don't think that you would.
What happened before the incident may be extremely relevant if it had a bearing upon the level of threat that the MP perceived.
Are you seriously saying that it would have no bearing upon the situation if the bloke had been following him for 200 yards whilst threatening to kill him?
I do this sh1t for a living and never accept a view based upon very limited information.