+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 84

Thread: O/T MP Mike Amesbury Video

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    1,375
    Whilst what you say is correct, it's very clear from the CCTV that Amesbury had the choice to walk away, both before he threw the punch, and afterwards when the guy was on the ground. If there is any question that he posed a threat whilst on his feet, there is no question once he was on the floor. I think either a judge, or a jury, will form the opinion that he was motivated by anger and the desire to inflict punishment, rather than genuine fear. If he was fearful, he wouldn't have returned to taunt the guy. Anyway, time will tell.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    22,872
    3am booze,argue, reap it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    8,640
    Quote Originally Posted by Brin View Post
    Quick question. Is he allowed to stand as an MP, if he has relevant previous convictions?
    I don't believe that there are any restrictions, but don't know for sure.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    52,690
    Quote Originally Posted by KerrAvon View Post
    I don't believe that there are any restrictions, but don't know for sure.
    Thanks for replying. It's just one thing that crossed my mind and I too wasn't sure if you had to have a non convictional record to stand as an MP.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2024
    Posts
    837
    Looks and sounds like he'd had a few to me - not that thats a crime buy we've all been there.

    Regardless of intimidation he's an MP for christs sake and knows hes gone too far.

    No we dont know all the facts but really would you like him to be your representative ????

    Some people do deserve a smack in the gob now and then but best to walk away these days of knife crime , muggings etc

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    2,084
    The only vid I have seen is of the victim standing still with his arms by his side before he is punched to the ground where the attacker continues his assault. Maybe the victim was saying hurty words and I do realise you can be jailed for that now .

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    2,567
    Quote Originally Posted by Brin View Post
    Thanks for replying. It's just one thing that crossed my mind and I too wasn't sure if you had to have a non convictional record to stand as an MP.
    No you just need to be a bare faced liar.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    22,872
    Quote Originally Posted by Stansmate View Post
    Looks and sounds like he'd had a few to me - not that thats a crime buy we've all been there.

    Regardless of intimidation he's an MP for christs sake and knows hes gone too far.

    No we dont know all the facts but really would you like him to be your representative ????

    Some people do deserve a smack in the gob now and then but best to walk away these days of knife crime , muggings etc
    Yep walk about with a white flag.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2024
    Posts
    837
    Ive intervened many times in my life but this guy may have insulted the MP or threatened him but had he walked off he wouldnt be in the 💩 he is now

    Its all about the threat and how you judge it all in a split second

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    9,284
    Quote Originally Posted by KerrAvon View Post
    In simple terms, a person is entitled to use reasonable force in all the circumstances in self-defence.

    A quick hypothetical for you in light of your comments: - a bloke approaches you in the street who appears to have a beef with you. He's aggressive and says, 'I'm going to stab you up you c*nt' and reaches into his pocket.

    On the basis of your post, would you think: 'Well, he's being very aggressive said he'd stab me, but he's put his hand in his pocket, so there's no problem'?

    I don't think that you would.

    And suppose you decided to hit him on the basis that you feared he was reaching for a knife, would you then think 'well he might be tooled up, but he's on the floor now, so all is well with the world'.

    I don't think that you would.

    What happened before the incident may be extremely relevant if it had a bearing upon the level of threat that the MP perceived.

    Are you seriously saying that it would have no bearing upon the situation if the bloke had been following him for 200 yards whilst threatening to kill him?

    I do this sh1t for a living and never accept a view based upon very limited information.
    When words like "reasonable" are used in legal definitions there are bound to be problems or differences of opinion.
    What one person considers to be "reasonable force" may be totally different to that of someone else.
    At the end of the day a word like "reasonable" is not measurable so any decision is nothing more or less than a matter of someone's opinion which is not a particularly satisfactory situation.

Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •