Ratings v Chesterfield

[maddogslater]

There's grown ups debating about Notts where you don't have to agree
and There's crazy talk about Jatta and Palmer

[PedroTheFisherman66]

Macca missed quite a few simple chances as well

I'm sure he didn't score to many when he played under Maynard and his new style of play...a few penalties but nor as prolific as he was under maynards style...

[marshall55]

We tweaked our style and Macca openly stated it didn't suit his game.

[PedroTheFisherman66]

We tweaked our style and Macca openly stated it didn't suit his game.

As I feared ! So I dont understand this yearning for buying him back. Loved the guy and hope he finds a club that will play to his talents, however that is not us or Millwall.We move on and search for more rough diamonds that will get polished up into the real thing..!

[Mud Pie]

probably not directly related, but McGoldrick wasn't great under LW, and has been outstanding under SM. Makes me wonder how Macca would perform if he did get back.

[MarcusCole]

Can someone please explain to me what the rankings are based on. I see someone getting a 6 and then described as poor, to me 5.5 would be average so a 6 would be slightly above average. If someone is poor they would be getting somewhere around a 4. I've been to several games where they have been absolute dross, then seen them describes as so but no one gets below a 5.

[1955pie]

Can someone please explain to me what the rankings are based on. I see someone getting a 6 and then described as poor, to me 5.5 would be average so a 6 would be slightly above average. If someone is poor they would be getting somewhere around a 4. I've been to several games where they have been absolute dross, then seen them describes as so but no one gets below a 5.

Eye of the beholder.