+ Visit Aberdeen FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 413 of 425 FirstFirst ... 313363403411412413414415423 ... LastLast
Results 4,121 to 4,130 of 5123

Thread: Rangers Then, Sevco Now, Scotland's Shame Forever....

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    33,119
    You can?t entertain the c*nts at all on the subject of penalties. Last season I had a horde of them at work telling me at great length on how you can?t tug a shirt in the box these days as it?s a penalty every time
    Fast forward a few weeks and the same mutants were telling me it?s ok to tug a shirt in the box under certain circumstances

    If the honky smelly inbred sister sh@gging w@nkers knew anything about football they wouldn?t support the Huns in the first place. You?re farting in the wind talking football with them

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,917
    Quote Originally Posted by swaddon2 View Post
    They had the chance to win the game, but didn't take it. That's fitba.
    Aye, for most of us it is, but that rancid lot will bring it up time and time again.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,917
    Some Hun zoomer on twitter claiming that if you add all the trophies the dead club and their tribute act 'won' and add all the Glasgow Cups, Tennents Sixes and other such shyte, they blow Celtic out the water in the trophy haul.



    Their lack of self awareness really is stunning.

  4. #4
    Can someone explain the rules to me?

    I would normally assume there is a different set for the hun but the explanation of why VAR was wrong in not awarding a penalty came from Willie Collum. He claimed that Scales had grabbed the Rangers player outside the box but had continued to hold him while said hun’s foot was on the line of the penalty box.

    Why is that deemed ‘inside the box’. A ball is out of play only if it has completely crossed a boundary line; it is only a goal if the ball is completely over the goal line. Why is ‘on the line’ of the penalty box then considered inside?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,500
    Quote Originally Posted by rustlinsweetiepapers View Post
    Can someone explain the rules to me?

    I would normally assume there is a different set for the hun but the explanation of why VAR was wrong in not awarding a penalty came from Willie Collum. He claimed that Scales had grabbed the Rangers player outside the box but had continued to hold him while said hun’s foot was on the line of the penalty box.

    Why is that deemed ‘inside the box’. A ball is out of play only if it has completely crossed a boundary line; it is only a goal if the ball is completely over the goal line. Why is ‘on the line’ of the penalty box then considered inside?
    Aye ... add tae that, if said hun had one foot on the line, Scales' hand and 'secured' portion of hun's shirt would be outside the penalty area. So the actual offense could nae be determined tae be inside the area ... or even on the line. Gollum clutchin' at straws methinks.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Posts
    1,487
    To be fair to Gollum, reluctantly, I think he made clear that the placing of the foot was a red herring, it was where the shirt was being held that mattered. And by all accounts that continued into the box. Personally I love the fact that it seems it should have been a penalty. Just more fuel for their ridiculous narrative.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2024
    Posts
    820
    “It’s about breaking open the (Dundee) wall,” said the Rangers manager on BBC Scotland. “It’s a challenge against Dundee for every team. They use every trick in the book – and sometimes outside the book – to stop you.”
    How dare Dundee try and stop Rangers.

    Clement seemed quite sane when he first came in but he quickly lapped up the hun kool-aid and has been infected with their superiority guff.
    Boys a prize pillock.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,917
    Quote Originally Posted by Don Julio View Post
    To be fair to Gollum, reluctantly, I think he made clear that the placing of the foot was a red herring, it was where the shirt was being held that mattered. And by all accounts that continued into the box. Personally I love the fact that it seems it should have been a penalty. Just more fuel for their ridiculous narrative.
    Life's us far too short to try and keep up with the ever evolving rule changeds to our game, but if the initial foul is outside the box then shouldn't it be a free kick?

    I'm nae fussed and don't overly concern myself with the rules, but listening to them it's like they are the only ones who lose out in these decisions.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    1,658
    The Press, as many will have seen, is full of reports that Rang*** were throwing their money around at Ibrox yesterday and that some Septic players were hit with missiles. I simply can’t believe the first bit and if there is any truth in the second part then I sincerely hope that they were ballistic.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,917
    Kris Boyds meltdowns after another sh*t performance by the tribute act are sheer joy.

    The sense of entitlement is breathtaking.

    Long may both his and his clubs misery continue.

Page 413 of 425 FirstFirst ... 313363403411412413414415423 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •