|
| + Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Please remember that when you respond to my posts that it’s not me doing the research nor do I appear in the videos.
It’s food for thought and it may just be against what the governments of the world want you to think.
‘What do you think about this report ?
https://x.com/vigilantfox/status/175...lcvxGrPcIOixGQ
I think,after careful consideration.
It is a load of bollox.
So here we have two failed popstars (although I would imagine that they made a bob or two out of ‘I’m too s3xy’ and probably still get the odd gig at the likes of Pontins) pushing a video from some unnamed gent who is railing against peer reviewed science (i.e. science that has been assessed by independent scientists and deemed to have the appearance of being sound).
What is the alternative to peer reviewed science? Made up crap that can be posted on Twitter? That certainly appears to be the go-to for anti-vaxers.
The report from the disgraced physicist and climate change denier?
The usual technique adopted when preparing such reports (if made up data is not used) is to be very selective in the choice of data that is used and to present it out of context. It would take ages to go through all of the video and check its contents (I’ll leave that to the peer review), but I can give you two quick examples of how that has been done here.
Two of the countries that feature on the video are Australia and New Zealand. As the video shows, neither of those countries showed any excess mortality in the immediate aftermath of the pandemic being declared. What the video fails to mention, however, is that both of those countries effectively closed their borders at that time and avoided any immediate widespread outbreak of Covid 19. They then opened their borders after the vaccine roll out and the disease spread widely bringing with it excess mortality, as you would expect.
The second point to note is that New Zealand has not experienced the post-covid excess death phenomenon, unlike countries such as the UK that were unsuccessful in avoiding a high level of circulation of Covid19 in an unvaccinated population. Surely that is relevant to the notion that it is the vaccines that are causing deaths?
Wonder why they don’t mention those things... It’s almost as though the maker of the video is pursuing an agenda and isn’t that interested in any sort of balanced view.
As we have discussed, it is beyond doubt that the vaccines reduce transmission. As for the notion that the chances of kids getting sick and being hospitalised with Covid were so low, what do you consider to be an acceptable number? How many deaths or long-term illness amongst children as a consequence of Covid infection do you consider to be acceptable?
Why do you think the vaccines were made available children?