Yeah, I deliberately ignored your question as it was referring to RJ's post which had no specific examples to discuss.
As an example, he picked the 4-2-3-1 formation. I don;t believe that this is a formation deployed only by McInnes. Many successful teams adopt this formation. Its certainly a discussion point and whilst it's may be viable to discuss and debate the merits of playing 4-2-3-1 with the personnel we have, or at home, I'd again challenge to show a post where I defended McInness for example playing that formation
He also picked up on defending McInness when he turned down SevCo.
At the time, that was great for winding up fans of the scum.
Of course, in hindsight, its maybe a valid point that they've "dodged a bullet", but at the time I loved winding up them.
That was my opinion at the time.
I recognised his strengths and his weaknesses.
His weaknesses are overcoming his strengths (on the playing field).
But that's still a subjective opinion. What have I staunchly defended him on specific issues.
those two are very vague and peripheral, but well done for having a look
well fk me tender
If I'm not mistaken you aksed for a post where you have defended him or stood up for him whatever (same thing in my book) and I give you one where it is clear you are standing up for him
Now whether your opinion has changed since that post is actually irrelevant,
I am starting to get the feeling that you will soon be asking for a seat on the half empty mini bus as your opinion recently does appear to be changing, (so well done for that and finally seeing the light)
But fk me min you asked for a post that shows you sticking up for him, I gave you one and still you come back trying to deflect it.
What a load of fkn b0ll0x, you really are like a old fish wife ffs, I dont think RJ is far off the mark with his thought about you being a 65 year old woman, you really are special aren't you
By the way it's standing room only on the mini bus now, but your very welcome to join
He truly is the forums 'special one' 😀