Team vs Chelsea

[Jammy89]

Striker/Defender/Owner/...add your own wants to the ever growing list.

Number 10. . .

[Jammy89]

Interesting stat

We've had 2 shots and both have been on target.

Chelsea have had 6 shots, only one has been on target but they scored from that 1.

[Davearmy]

number 10. . .

gk,lb,cam,rw

[Davearmy]

Interesting stat

We've had 2 shots and both have been on target.

Chelsea have had 6 shots, only one has been on target but they scored from that 1.

That's because Chelsea have a striker who can kick a ball in a straight line hahaha

[Curian]

*******s

[Davearmy]

2-0 fecking shocking someone needs to dropkick Saivet in the face at half time.

[Jammy89]

And it's Batshuayi again.

Christ sake.

What is more annoying is we've actually got hte ball in their box and had some attacks, we just have nobody that can score.

[Jammy89]

Just said that being 2-0 down is harsh on Newcastle but they are not taking their chances at all.

[Jammy89]

On BBC as well

Chelsea 2-0 Newcastle

Willy Caballero made five saves in that first half. As I said, 2-0 is harsh on Newcastle.

Again on the stats.

5 shots on goal, 5 on target for Newcastle.
8 shots on goal, 2 on target for Chelski, yet their two on target have both ended up in back of the net.

We've not played that badly overall. We're just not clinical enough and it'll cost us in the league as well if don't get a new bloody striker.

[jacapus]

Just said that being 2-0 down is harsh on Newcastle but they are not taking their chances at all.

Nothing new there then....... same old shyte,,,,,,, we had chances BUT,,,,,,,