He would have more credence if he were to go after ALL rapists and ***ual offenders, not just the Muslim ones. He ignored the trial of half a dozen white guys found guilty of raping babies the week before last. He pounces on stats like 84% of the members of these grooming gangs are Muslim. Groomers are, however, just a tiny part of the rape and sxual assault crimes in the UK. A whopping 90% of ALL those committing such crimes, individually and in groups are white. Not a stat that sits well with Yaxley-Lennon. Just like the fact that one of his closest henchmen in the EDL has recently been jailed for raping a 10 year old........
Unfortunately for the victims of the current, ongoing grooming trials in several courts, some of the accused in those cases were also involved in the case "reported on" by Yaxley-Lennon aka Robinson. It is not yet clear whether any of the solicitors in those other trials try to push for a retrial due to Robinson prejudicing their client's chance of a fair trial. If they do that and the judge agrees he will rule it a mistrial. He will then either a) order a retrial which will mean the victims have to go through their ordeal again OR b) decide it is no longer possible for them to get a fair trial and simply set them free. Neither option is one that benefits the victims in any way, shape or form, it is actually hugely negative for them. Robbo and those sticking up for him might like to think of the girl victims long, long before they turn any attention towards Yaxley-Lennon.
However rushed his arrest, trial and conviction may have been, however little time the judge spent watching the video as reportd by one dodgy right wing blog, the facts remain as follows:
1. He was arrested and given a suspended sentence for Contempt of Court for reporting on a case in which reporting restrictions were in place in 2017
2. The judge in that case went to great lengths, during sentencing, to explain to him that a repeat of reporting on a case in which reporting restrictions were in place would lead to his arrest and any sentence handed down would be served consecutively with the 3 months suspended for 18 months. As a repeat offender he got 10 months plus the 3 suspended months. He had been warned.
3. Last week saw him again "reporting" on a trial with reporting restrictions in place. He was told by court officials more than once that he shouldn't and couldn't film about the case. He ignored them.
4. He plead guilty so he knew what he had done
5. I have never seen a video or read an article in which he shows the slightest sympathy for the victims. They appear to bee a means to an end for him and it is not beyond the bounds of possibility that he actually did this on purpose to get arrested and sent down in the hope that it would stir up a hornets' nest of protests and violence.
Even if the authorities have merely found an excuse, any excuse, to teach Yaxley-Lennon a lesson, I have not the slightest pity for him. He knew what he was doing, knew the consequences and still went out and did it.