![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
laddo
It was necessary in the eyes of the people looking at the books, the people having to pay the bills. Truly desperate times, truly desperate measures. The impact of closing was detrimental for many years to come.
It was the way you worded the statement/question Don. Without doubt this is a club issue, and sadly a long standing one. It's nothing new.
There is criticism aimed at Ardley for not playing youngsters, I think back to Nolan's tenure and he never played the younger squad members at any point!
Then I think back further and try my best to remember when the last time a manager did. Alladyce? Steve Thompson? Anyone since then? I'm struggling since Mick Walker tbh.
Your last paragraph leads to one of the historic reasons for such a poor showing from the Youth Academy, the constant change of managers, the lack of stability at managerial level doesn't lend itself to any manager wanting to throw in most talented young players into the first team to develop them.
Another negative of the revolving door at Meadow Lane. If the owners are going to approach managerial appointments and tenures differently (longer term) then it lends itself to allowing the manager to use more YA players.
Obviously other factors include change in ownerships, multiple financial issues, reputational damage when academy was stopped and finally the old classic "they just aren't good enough to make the step up".
Overall along with our historic transfer policy it's a sorry show.
I keep my fingers crossed that the YA production and productivity at 1st team level will much improve under the current owners just like the player recruitment will/has. It has to or we won't go anywhere long term.