
Originally Posted by
Old_time_miller
And just what do you think makes clark any better or worse than hamshaw? Or any other previous managers?
You talk of whole club culture, etc, we all agree on that
.yet one man comes in and has to suffer no money, and fight against the culture talked of. Minimal everything now.
It is events previously which end up in this manager and the previous 3 managers, ham, evans, rich, staying in office for 5 mins.
And ill tell you why, because the board sacked each too early to find out, due to non instant results
we all thought the squad was wrong, this was wrong, that, the other.
You want a culture change, you want long term, yet all the managers after warne had people on their backs when the going went a bit tough.
We never really saw how good or bad things could really be because ham or richardson or taylor or evans did not get he 3 years.
It isnt going to happen, not with this culture and board.
The common denominator to judge evans, hamshaw, clark by is the players and how we came to have such lame ducks, and square pegs.
Because it is going to happen again!