+ Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 53 of 85 FirstFirst ... 343515253545563 ... LastLast
Results 521 to 530 of 899

Thread: O/T:- 🏏The other Notts [Cricket]

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,307
    Awful decision they bowled less than 60 overs first innings Durham only have 10 fit players there was no way Notts would bat again not enough time left for Durham to get the required runs to make a game of it

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    5,314
    I really don’t get how people can criticise the decision to bat on. For me it was obvious once the only way we couldn’t win the title is if we lost. Batting on 100% guaranteed that. Batting on ensured no silly injuries to bowlers. Did we win the title? Yep. Job done and the players could relax and enjoy it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    35,943
    Quote Originally Posted by Notts78 View Post
    I really don’t get how people can criticise the decision to bat on. For me it was obvious once the only way we couldn’t win the title is if we lost.
    There was absolutely zero chance of us losing if we had enforced the follow on. Durham were never going to score the 450 runs to avoid an innings defeat and then build a sufficient lead to bowl us out in less than two days. Batting on didn’t ensure we wouldn’t lose, we’d already done that. If time had been lost to the weather it might have prevented us winning though. I know we didn’t need to win, but why risk settling for a draw when a victory was highly likely?

    It looks like it won’t matter anyway, but the decision to bat again was a strange one.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    2,241
    Quote Originally Posted by Notts78 View Post
    I really don’t get how people can criticise the decision to bat on. For me it was obvious once the only way we couldn’t win the title is if we lost. Batting on 100% guaranteed that. Batting on ensured no silly injuries to bowlers. Did we win the title? Yep. Job done and the players could relax and enjoy it.
    ^^^^
    This

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2021
    Posts
    2,579
    It would be interesting to hear the club's take on it. The only reason I can think is to give the bowlers some rest as we only have three seam bowlers.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    35,943
    Quote Originally Posted by Magpies1959 View Post
    It would be interesting to hear the club's take on it. The only reason I can think is to give the bowlers some rest as we only have three seam bowlers.
    Even then they would only have had to bowl short three or four over bursts with Patterson-White and Mullaney at the other end.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,307
    Wow Bushnell just hit Patterson for 6 only 472 needed can we do it

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    35,943
    Quote Originally Posted by pjace View Post
    Wow Bushnell just hit Patterson for 6 only 472 needed can we do it
    Yes we can. Those 121 runs we added were obviously crucial.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,307
    Durham 99 for 8 only need another 478 good job Notts batted again instead of forcing the follow on

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,307
    It's all over not scrape a lucky win by a mere 462 runs

    Congrats though boys on the title

Page 53 of 85 FirstFirst ... 343515253545563 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •