v Sheep (a)

[stokearab]

He played twice there in the league cup. Most of the second half v Arbroath and the game v East Fife. Not a huge fan of him in there though.

Never knew that. Bizarre.

[stokearab]

Appere wont play surely? I dont think we will get any signings just from the narrative from the club and i like to noise up that shed21 character that is banned - so just going to say that ITK

I have a hunch that its 352 and may well be as follows (although i dont think it should be):

Siegrist (unless sold by then)

Edwards Reynolds Mulgrew
Smith Butcher Harkes Fuchs Robson
Clark Shankland

I would like

Edwards Smith Mulgrew
Freeman Mochrie Fuchs Hoti Robson
Shanks Chalmers

Same as my preference on P1 except I have Reynolds instead of Smith. Think that could be a very exciting team to watch. Plenty 4-3's!

[BackRowArab]

Never knew that. Bizarre.

I think it was more to get him game time

[stokearab]

Actually that makes sense.

[tHeArAb]

I like Appere so would be good to see him involved, was a definite starter most of the time the season before last, good player, needs a run though, forgot Sporle too but he is injured isn't he?

Appere, Sporle and Robson are all injured, with the latter two are doing some sort of training at least.

[tHeArAb]

I wouldn't be surprised to see Smith start in the back three. There's not an ounce of pace between Reynolds, Mulgrew and Edwards so it does make sense.

Smith, Edwards & Mulgrew in the three with Freeman and Duffy/Robson at wing back.

[stokearab]

I'm not really getting this tbh. We have 5 fit CB'S but we're looking to play a regular FB there? Might be a revelation who knows.

[tHeArAb]

I'm not really getting this tbh. We have 5 fit CB'S but we're looking to play a regular FB there? Might be a revelation who knows.

Don't get me wrong, I'd prefer Kerr Smith than Liam. I don't rate Liam at full back, nevermind centre half but it wouldn't surprise me to see him at CB. Not all 5 centre halfs can play the right centre half role either. Mulgrew and Reynolds certainly can't, so that's a bit of a flawed argument.

For me it's either K. Smith, Edwards & Mulgrew or Edwards, Mulgrew & Reynolds.

[Chick A Saw]

I'm not really getting this tbh. We have 5 fit CB'S but we're looking to play a regular FB there? Might be a revelation who knows.

Yes we have the 5 CBs, but that should not keep the full backs out of the team should the tactics allow. I believe that Freeman can play right across the back 4/5, Robson has played LCB and L Smith used RCB recently. Its not beyond the realms of possibility that Freeman has created a selection headache and L Smiths inclusion at right of the 3 is down to us being a bit light of experience in that position until Connolly gets back.

[Arabknight]

I wouldn't be surprised to see Smith start in the back three. There's not an ounce of pace between Reynolds, Mulgrew and Edwards so it does make sense.

Smith, Edwards & Mulgrew in the three with Freeman and Duffy/Robson at wing back.

I wld have Neilson instead of smith. The young lad seem to lack a bit of pace during the Elgin game (maybe due to pressure season) and was a bit naive at times.