|
| + Visit Barnsley FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
How'd this thread end up here after a Whatsapp scam !!??
Anyway, just for info for the non corporates who think that free lunches are commonplace and company cars are some kind of tax scam here's some info for you from the real corporate world - which is actually real and not assumed out of envy and bitterness -
It's called The Bribery Act 2012.
Amongst other things it places a duty on employers to ensure that acts of bribery ( free lunches, football tickets, nights out) aren't committed on it's behalf.
Yes these things happen routinely in order to build/maintain business relationships - but you are expected to declare them and they need authorising before they take place. As Kerr posted earlier we are each responsible for what we do and what comes out of our mouths, the trouble with today's society is that so many people try to make out that they're not responsible for they're own actions because Daddy didn't love them enough or mummy didn't tuck them up in bed.
Ultimately the choices we make are ours.
If aah can help sumboddi azza gu along then my livin ez not been in vain Kerr--
10.35am on 21 03 18. Thread started by Ziles (Exile) entitled OT Analytica.
Hope that helps.
I try to live by much the same philosophy, SB, but still get abused by Exile.
I can't find a thread entitled OT Analytica by Ziles. Can you put up a link?
The only thread about Analytica by Ziles that I have seen is called O/T Analytica (Kerr to open debate?) . I saw that within a few minutes of him putting it up and thought it a very strange approach to the subject. He clearly had an opinion to bother to start a thread and I am always interested in his views, hence I asked him why he didn't start a thread about Analytica in which he expressed an opinion. He replied that he had, but I just can’t find that one and he appears reluctant to put up a link for some weird reason, despite a number of polite requests.
Thankyou SB
Kerr as usual playing semantics
He keeps adding "in which you expressed an opinion"
He knows full well that I started a thread of the title O/T Analytica [Kerr to open debate] on the date you mentioned
I have become totally p!ssed of with Kerr never starting a thread but always eager to contradict
My purpose as he well understands was for once in his psychopathic head was for him to offer his view FIRST
He maintains he has started two threads in total TWO THREADS FFS but has not indicated when & what about
I have also asked him if he has stopped beating his wife but he has ignored the question
A simple yes or no will suffice
Ah… I see the problem. You would have preferred me to have asked a different question.
Of course I keep adding in the words ‘in which you expressed an opinion’. That was the question that I asked at the outset and to which you answered ‘I did’. Or are you denying that too? I can pop up a link if you’d like? Simply because you now find it inconvenient that I asked you why you didn’t start a thread in which you expressed an opinion has nothing to do with semantics.
Let’s start again (with the same question – read it carefully and check). If you wanted to talk about Analytica, why didn’t you just start a thread in which you expressed an opinion?
Eric Bray, Eric Bray,
The best I here them say.
Last dealings I ed wi a Barnsley solicitor wo Raleys wi Miners Compensation Scheme fo mi dad.
Mi dad gorra few hundred forriz lung disease, Raleys got ovva two grand fo filling a few sheets a paper in abart it.
Nivva edda free lunch in his life.
Last edited by SBRed48; 22-04-2018 at 03:51 PM.