BOJO. The end.

[army88]

But, but, but, BT, where are all those Labour politicians going to send their children to school when the private education sector is closed down ? I think we should be told.

Come on Sinkov you should know by now that labour is for the many not the few.

Rich labour people - politicians don’t educate children privately - do they ?

Proper makes me laugh, where do they think all this money is coming from?

[sinkov]

Come on Sinkov you should know by now that labour is for the many not the few.

Rich labour people - politicians don’t educate children privately - do they ?

I assumed they didn't army, it would be the height of hypocrisy if they did wouldn't it. So I was shocked to discover this morning that Jeremy Corbyn himself had a priviledged education, at a Prep School and a private Grammar School, perhaps the other pupils took the piss out of him, which is why he dislikes Tories. But Corbyn is not the only Labour hypocrite, his mate Suemas Milne also has an aversion to bog standard comprehensives, he shunned his local one and sent his children to grammars, Dianne Abbott, sent her son to City of London School, £19K a year, not that daft after all is she, Valerie Vaz sent her daughter to Latymer Upper School, £21K a year, it's probably easier to list the Labour politicians that don't ensure their kids are kept out of the state system.

The thing I can't get my head round army is why apparently intelligent people like BT are taken in by these charlatans, you and I and millions of others can can see through them from miles away, but BT can't, it's a mystery to me.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

Have you won the Euro millions BT to contribute towards all those things you e listed.
You do realise you’re leaving yourself open when they can’t deliver any of the above like you say.

As I said as well even if they do, something else will be cut - penalised to pay for it.

And you’ll be pi—ing someone else off

Boris has just promised 40 new NHS hospitals. Perhaps he has at last found Corbyn's money tree?

[barrie_burn]

Or perhaps he's found out where we store our dry powder

[army88]

I assumed they didn't army, it would be the height of hypocrisy if they did wouldn't it. So I was shocked to discover this morning that Jeremy Corbyn himself had a priviledged education, at a Prep School and a private Grammar School, perhaps the other pupils took the piss out of him, which is why he dislikes Tories. But Corbyn is not the only Labour hypocrite, his mate Suemas Milne also has an aversion to bog standard comprehensives, he shunned his local one and sent his children to grammars, Dianne Abbott, sent her son to City of London School, £19K a year, not that daft after all is she, Valerie Vaz sent her daughter to Latymer Upper School, £21K a year, it's probably easier to list the Labour politicians that don't ensure their kids are kept out of the state system.

The thing I can't get my head round army is why apparently intelligent people like BT are taken in by these charlatans, you and I and millions of others can can see through them from miles away, but BT can't, it's a mystery to me.

I suppose it wouldn’t do if we we’re all the same Sinkov but agreed it’s sad when they can’t see wood for the trees.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

Seriously? I hate hypocrisy at all of its levels.

My contempt for any Labour MP who privately educates their children knows no bounds.

Practice what you preach is my motto.

[army88]

Seriously? I hate hypocrisy at all of its levels.

My contempt for any Labour MP who privately educates their children knows no bounds.

Practice what you preach is my motto.

I agree BT and you probably do and tbh I’d believe you as well.
However your party and what it stands for supposedly can’t quite get it right.

It’s like I said to you before you’d be lucky to split conservative and labour parties, they are becoming alike.

Some of your old school will be turning in their graves

[The Bedlington Terrier]

I agree BT and you probably do and tbh I’d believe you as well.
However your party and what it stands for supposedly can’t quite get it right.

It’s like I said to you before you’d be lucky to split conservative and labour parties, they are becoming alike.

Some of your old school will be turning in their graves

This is a serious matter army88. Pierre Bourdieu the world renowned French sociologist calls this tendency to reproduce the established order (eg. Your grandfather went to Eton, I went to Eton, you will go to Eton) the retention of "cultural capital".

The Labour Party are now looking at replicating the Finnish education system, where basically no-one can pay for education. All children have exactly the same schooling, and apparently it's a world beating educational paradigm...

http://www.strangerless.com/truth-fi...cation-system/

[army88]

This is a serious matter army88. Pierre Bourdieu the world renowned French sociologist calls this tendency to reproduce the established order (eg. Your grandfather went to Eton, I went to Eton, you will go to Eton) the retention of "cultural capital".

The Labour Party are now looking at replicating the Finnish education system, where basically no-one can pay for education. All children have exactly the same schooling, and apparently it's a world beating educational paradigm...

http://www.strangerless.com/truth-fi...cation-system/

I have nothing against people educating their children BT in any way shape or form regardless of political party.

There has always been and always will be them with more money and them with less it’s just how it is.

You can’t have a state where all are the same ( that’s a different political issue entirely)

I think Sinkov and my point was only that you intimated re privileged people and their social standing and how wrong it was when you’re leader was educated privately along with many others in the Labour Party and their children.

There isn’t an answer to what your suggesting because there will always be a social standing , I think your point re how many ladles to a individual points to equality for all and not just some but what will you do tax the rich more to sort it ?

It doesn’t work all you end up doing is forcing people who we definitely need away form our country.

I’ve alluded to it before there is only one pot of money and it isn’t big enough to do everything that’s for sure.

[sinkov]

The Labour Party are now looking at replicating the Finnish education system, where basically no-one can pay for education. All children have exactly the same schooling, and apparently it's a world beating educational paradigm...

I was on holiday in Majorca a couple of years ago BT, it was September, we always go during school term to avoid other people's brats ruining the peace and tranquility we search for, so I was a bit disconcerted to find two young girls cavorting in the pool of our expensive hotel. I asked their parents how they had got them off school and was told they didn't go to school, they were educated at home by their mum. Of course this is fine if you can afford to do it, but not many can, does Labour propose to ban this and force every parent to send their child to a state school ? Imo, it's not the business of government to tell parents how and where their children will be educated, and if Labour propose that it's they who decide where your child will be educated, even to the extent of banning home education and forcing parents to send their children to a bog standard comprehensive, then I and millions of others would seriously have to consider voting Tory.

Incidentally, the two girls were a delight to have around and made our holiday even more enjoyable, a credit to their parents.