OT Corrupt BBC at it again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[mygiddypant]

You see what we have here is a complete generation thats gone through school and university and been indoctrinated in left wing thoughts and doctrine. In turn they get jobs of influence and employ like minded people. These people in turn employ more left wing individuals.

That’s why you get a “balanced” output as programs like Question Time, Have I Got News Got you and The Graham Norton Show are commissioned to push the left wing and woke agenda.

It’s sackings at middle management that’s needed

In recent weeks the following Reform politicians/supporters have appeared on QT - Richard Tice, Zia Yusuf, Nadine Dorries, Matt Goodwin.

Since 2010 Nigel Farage has made more appearances on QT than any other politician.

Tice and Yusuf have appeared on Kuennsberg recently.

Given that Reform have 5 MPs they have been massively over-represented on BBC tv this year.

Good luck with finding far-right comics to do the equivalent of HIGNFY.

Isn't Norton a presenter of a show for celebs? Are you saying there aren't any celebs to represent Reform?

[Lolmorgan]

Big heads have rolled.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cd9kqz1yyxkt

Still keeps his pension tho, they should have sacked him.

[mygiddypant]

Let's see what Chat GPT thinks....

Did Donald Trump order the National Guard to intervene in the insurrection on Jan 6th?

No — Donald Trump did not give a clear, formal order to deploy the District of Columbia National Guard (DC NG) in response to the January 6 United States Capitol attack at the moment when the breach was occurring.
Here are the key details:
✅ What we do know
In the period leading up to January 6, the DC NG is under the authority of the President (via the Secretary of the Army/Defense) rather than a state governor.
GovInfo
+2
FactCheck.org
+2
Multiple sources show that the DC NG required authorization from the Department of Defense/Army before responding to the Capitol.
FactCheck.org
+2
Just Security
+2
A timeline by FactCheck.org shows the first requests for the Guard arrived from the United States Capitol Police and D.C. authorities around 1:30 p.m., and the Guard was not formally approved to move until 3:04 p.m. or later.
FactCheck.org
+1
A fact‐check by the Associated Press says Trump did not sign an order to deploy 20,000 troops ahead of the attack.
AP News
❓ What is less clear / disputed
Trump later claimed he “immediately deployed” the Guard and law-enforcement to secure the building. But that claim conflicts with the documented delays and bureaucratic procedures.
FactCheck.org
+1
Some transcripts and statements suggest that Trump did give broad directives to protect January 6 activities or supporters, including use of the Guard. For example, a White House transcript claims he directed Pentagon leadership to “make sure any events on January 6 … were safe — including using the National Guard.”
cha.house.gov
However, in public and congressional testimony, the acting Secretary of Defense at the time, Christopher Miller, said he never received any direct order from Trump to deploy Guard troops for the Capitol.
Axios
�� Summary
So:
Trump might have offered or authorized in broad terms the use of the National Guard in support of January 6 events.
But there was no documented direct, formal order from Trump at the moment of the breach directing the National Guard to intervene at the Capitol, nor was there a timely mobilization that matches Trump’s claim of “immediate deployment.”
The delay in deploying the Guard was due to procedural / chain-of-command issues, not simply a single missing order—though whether Trump could have intervened quicker remains a subject of investigation.
If you like, I can pull up the detailed timeline (minute-by-minute) showing who requested what and when the Guard was approved and arrived. Would you like that?

[Timbertop]

Spot on Grist. Fortunately youngsters who are prepared to work hard expect to be rewarded for their endeavours and quickly ditch socialism,the politics of envy.

[mygiddypant]

And if you thought that was a one-off, there's more

https://www.instagram.com/p/DPdx_IhDv9X/

[Lolmorgan]

This could be very costly.Trump threatens legal action against BBC as chairman apologises for 'error of judgement' on speech edit.

[frogmiller]

This could be very costly.Trump threatens legal action against BBC as chairman apologises for 'error of judgement' on speech edit.

He? has he already said that he will sue unless he gets an apology 😂

Some reports say that it could be as much as ?30 quid on the tv licence.

If they don?t and the BBC lose it is just another incompetent move by the government and another tax to protect lying idiots!

Don?t worry. They may reduce the donation to Ukraine and blackrock whose Ukrainian ski resort will be open for business soon!

😂😂😂

[CAMiller]

Started with an insult John. Well done!!

Did I write during or did someone else? You was the first in our little conversation not me!

Who was president at the time of the so called insurrection?

If it was Trump then he was busy having his speech changed 😂

If Biden was the president during the so called resurrection then he could have called for the national guard surely!

It is crazy how so many have deflected the bad behaviour of the BBC to nit pick the other points of a situation to justify the wrong doing!

Not sure if it was a rhetorical question Frog but Trump was President before, during and immediately after the insurrection.

[frogmiller]

Not sure if it was a rhetorical question Frog but Trump was President before, during and immediately after the insurrection.

He has all the power until the 21st jan.

[frogmiller]

Could Donald trump have unilaterally ordered the national guard to protect the capitol on j6?