O/T Covid Vaccine mRNA

[ragingpup]

Other than being told by those pushing 'The Science' (™), how could you tell that the severity was reduced?

1 minute search on Lancet report: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/l...015-2/fulltext

Are you saying that the vaccines did not/do not reduce the severity of the different covid variations? At all?

[Eternal Optimist]

1 minute search on Lancet report: [url]https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(23)00015-2/fulltext[/url ...

Yeah, The Lancet. Owned by Elsevier Properties S.A., who are owned by RELX Group.

Their majority shareholders are Blackrock, Vanguard and State Street - the exact same people who own the pharmaceutical companies trousering billions from the taxpayers of the Western world.

Whoever pays the piper...

...Are you saying that the vaccines did not/do not reduce the severity of the different covid variations? At all?

Not me - I'm just the messenger. However, there are tens of thousands of renowned medical experts worldwide saying precisely that. Mainly those who are not in receipt of said taxpayer funding, thus enabling them to be in a position to speak the truth unhindered.

[frogmiller]

🚨The National Academies of Sciences says that "it is now established that the myocarditis comes from the vaccination...one has to say, sadly, that of 100 people who get myocarditis today, something in the range of 20 to 50% will not be among us after 10 years...this is murder."🚨

Sucharit Bhakdi, a retired Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology and former Chair of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, describes for Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson (@LauraLynnTT) how the
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine—a congressionally chartered organization that serves as the collective scientific national academy of the United States—has confirmed that both Pfizer and Moderna's COVID injections cause myocarditis.

Estimating the rate of myocarditis post COVID injection based on a study published in Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease in 2022, Bhakdi says it's likely that one to two percent of injection recipients will develop the heart condition. Meaning out of every 1,000,000 injection recipients, up to 20,000 will develop myocarditis. Of that cohort, Bhakdi says, we can expect up to 50% to die within the next 10 years.

"[T]hey looked at al the literature, all the evidence" and for most conditions possibly caused by the COVID injections, "they were not completely sure and the data are still not sufficient," Bhakdi says of the National Academies injection analysis. He notes that "For myocarditis, [they said it's] now established that the myocarditis comes from the vaccination...And they wrote that further scientific investigation will not lead to any other conclusion."

This means that "any myocarditis that anyone sees in the world following vaccination is known now to be due to the vaccine," Bhakdi adds.

He goes on to highlight the paper published in Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, saying that the team, made of Thai researchers working in Thailand, "used [modern medical] techniques to see what the incidence was of myocarditis in young people, and the results were completely clear: incidence was something in the range of...1 to 2%."

One percent means if you "vaccinate" 1,000,000 people, 10,000 are going to get myocarditis," Bhakdi notes. He adds that myocarditis is a "slow killer" that will wipe out 20 to 50% of those affected by it within a decade.

He notes the injections have doubtlessly "shortened the lifespan of [affected children] by decades."

"[T]his is murder," Bhakdi says.

https://x.com/sensereceptor/status/1...lcvxGrPcIOixGQ

[millavanilla]

🚨The National Academies of Sciences says that "it is now established that the myocarditis comes from the vaccination...one has to say, sadly, that of 100 people who get myocarditis today, something in the range of 20 to 50% will not be among us after 10 years...this is murder."🚨

Sucharit Bhakdi, a retired Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology and former Chair of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, describes for Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson (@LauraLynnTT) how the
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine—a congressionally chartered organization that serves as the collective scientific national academy of the United States—has confirmed that both Pfizer and Moderna's COVID injections cause myocarditis.

Estimating the rate of myocarditis post COVID injection based on a study published in Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease in 2022, Bhakdi says it's likely that one to two percent of injection recipients will develop the heart condition. Meaning out of every 1,000,000 injection recipients, up to 20,000 will develop myocarditis. Of that cohort, Bhakdi says, we can expect up to 50% to die within the next 10 years.

"[T]hey looked at al the literature, all the evidence" and for most conditions possibly caused by the COVID injections, "they were not completely sure and the data are still not sufficient," Bhakdi says of the National Academies injection analysis. He notes that "For myocarditis, [they said it's] now established that the myocarditis comes from the vaccination...And they wrote that further scientific investigation will not lead to any other conclusion."

This means that "any myocarditis that anyone sees in the world following vaccination is known now to be due to the vaccine," Bhakdi adds.

He goes on to highlight the paper published in Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, saying that the team, made of Thai researchers working in Thailand, "used [modern medical] techniques to see what the incidence was of myocarditis in young people, and the results were completely clear: incidence was something in the range of...1 to 2%."

One percent means if you "vaccinate" 1,000,000 people, 10,000 are going to get myocarditis," Bhakdi notes. He adds that myocarditis is a "slow killer" that will wipe out 20 to 50% of those affected by it within a decade.

He notes the injections have doubtlessly "shortened the lifespan of [affected children] by decades."

"[T]his is murder," Bhakdi says.

https://x.com/sensereceptor/status/1...lcvxGrPcIOixGQ

Ive seen this..seems the lucky ones are the ones who dont like needles and didnt have it..no world war for 80 years, no wipeout diseases, people living longer,
Looks like its sorted..
And the sheep followed...

[millavanilla]

Ive seen this..seems the lucky ones are the ones who dont like needles and didnt have it..no world war for 80 years, no wipeout diseases, people living longer,
Looks like its sorted..
And the sheep followed...

Of course, unless its absolutely proven, i suppose we shall never know..

[frogmiller]

Of course, unless its absolutely proven, i suppose we shall never know..

There are weirder things said about the mNRA vaccines.
It’s the career politicians that don’t want to get involved with any investigation to ease the minds of those of us that want confirmation.

[frogmiller]

Don’t worry apparently Bill Gates has a vaccine.


H5N1 bird flu was circulating in dairy cows for four months before it was detected, USDA scientists say

By Brenda Goodman, CNN
4 minute read
Updated 4:10 PM EDT, Fri May 3, 2024
USDA scientists say the H5N1 virus was probably spreading in cows for at least four months before it was detected.
USDA scientists say the H5N1 virus was probably spreading in cows for at least four months before it was detected. Cynthia Goldsmith/CDC
CNN
—
Bird flu was probably circulating in dairy cows for at least four months before it was confirmed to be the highly pathogenic H5N1 virus, according to a new analysis of genomic data by scientists at the US Department of Agriculture’s Animal Disease Center.

The research also found infected cattle that had no apparent connections, suggesting that “there are affected herds that have not yet been identified,” the study said.

It adds to a growing pile of evidence suggesting that the H5N1 virus had a head start in the US dairy industry for months before it came to the attention of scientists and government regulators.

The USDA’s study was published as a preprint, ahead of peer review, on the BioRXIV server on Wednesday.

Cows are seen standing in a feedlot on June 14, 2023 in Quemado, Texas.
RELATED ARTICLE
Spikes of flu virus in wastewater raise questions about spread of bird flu
It follows a similar analysis by an independent international group of almost two dozen evolutionary and molecular biologists who quickly analyzed raw genome sequences uploaded by the government to a server maintained by the National Library of Medicine. Despite the lack of critical background information on those samples, that group came to nearly the same conclusion as the USDA: that the virus had crossed over from wild birds to cows between mid-November and mid-January, which means it was circulating for months before anyone knew.

The USDA officially confirmed the presence of the H5N1 virus on March 25 in dairy cows in Texas. Since then, at least three dozen infected herds have been reported across nine states. At least one farmworker who was in contact with infected cows in Texas also tested positive for H5N1, the second human case of this type of flu ever reported in the US. The worker was given antiviral medication and has recovered.

Tests of milk from retail stores have shown inert remants of the virus in about 1 in 5 samples, the US Food and Drug Administration reported last week, suggesting that the infection had become widespread. Further testing by the FDA has confirmed that the virus in the samples of pasteurized dairy products was not active and couldn’t make anyone sick, but experts have strongly advised against the consumption of raw milk.

“We could have done a much better job” catching H5N1 in dairy cows, said Dr. Michael Worobey, head of the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Arizona who was part of the group of biologists that conducted the independent analysis. He studies how pandemics start.

Worobey said that as soon as the cows were noticeably sick with something mysterious, instead of testing for specific viruses and bacteria, ideally, a lab would have used a technique called metagenomic sequencing, which reads all the genetic material in a sample and uses computers help pick out relevant information.

“If that had been done, that would have revealed H5N1 in January and then even beyond that,” he said.

If we’re serious about preventing outbreaks in animals that could lead to human pandemics, Worobey said, regulators need to change their approach.

“We have to get out of the mindset of waiting for that tip of the iceberg of sick animals or sick humans to be noticed.” Instead, he said, animals need to be routinely tested with “modern techniques” for identifiying emerging pathogens.

The new study gives the USDA’s account of how bird flu seemed to spread so quickly to herds across the US. Samples collected between March 7 and April 8 found very similar H5N1 viruses in 26 herds in eight states and six poultry flocks in three states, suggesting that the virus had crossed over in a single spillover event between wild birds and cows.

The study says “production veterinarians” first noticed cows who weren’t eating well with changes to their milk production and quality in late January.

H5N1 has been devastating wild and domestic bird populations in the US since 2022, and it has infected a growing number of mammals.

In addition to the movement between cattle and wild birds, the study found evidence that infected cattle had passed the virus to domestic poultry flocks “through multiple transmission routes.” The researchers also found that the virus involved in the current outbreak had infected a wild animal – a raccoon – and cats that lived near the cows on dairy farms.

GET CNN HEALTH'S WEEKLY NEWSLETTER

Sign up here to get The Results Are In with Dr. Sanjay Gupta every Tuesday from the CNN Health team.

Interestingly, the virus sequenced from the infected farmworker had key differences from the cow genomes. The USDA scientists concluded that the differences might mean they were missing samples from the animals the farmworker had come into contact with or could have been due to the evolution of the virus from host to host.

Worobey says the study means H5N1 is “now seemingly well-entrenched in the dairy cattle population in the country” and might be something we have to deal with for years to come.

Although it’s by no means clear that this virus will change in the right combination of ways to launch a human pandemic, he said, allowing a virus to get a foothold in a population of domesticated animals puts everyone at risk.

“It does add one more species – a very important species – that didn’t have influenza A virus circulating in it before to the list of species where these viruses can have the opportunity to find that right combination that allows them to wreak havoc in the human population, not just animals,” he said

[crashbang]

Me and Mrs crash had our fifth jab today, still not grown two heads.

[frogmiller]

Me and Mrs crash had our fifth jab today, still not grown two heads.

For a virus that no longer exists 😂

Well done Crash. Seriously well done!

[crashbang]

For a virus that no longer exists 😂



Well done Crash. Seriously well done!

https://ukhsa-dashboard.data.gov.uk/

Think you are talking bolliks still.