dna

[afc1903mad]

OK here's a draft of cold reality.

Your post is not reality though, it’s supposition.

[Mason89]

Your post is not reality though, it’s supposition.

That’s only because of the interesting way your brain works

[afc1903mad]

That’s only because of the interesting way your brain works

Yes, that’s the reality

[RED_JOHN]

That’s only because of the interesting way your brain works

His brain works similar to a sat nav. When you don’t follow the route it tells you it will quickly tell you another way to the same destination. afc190mad is the Aberdeen FC propaganda sat nav. Don’t question the manager’s ability, players ability or even the dna money as the replies will always be everything is good at Aberdeen FC.
S.Milnes very own comical Ali.

[RED_JOHN]

All the dna members are getting shafted by Milne and his multi millionaire board members. There is absolutely no chance of the club spending the extra cash provided by its own fans to also go on top of our normal playing budget.
That money might at best be kept for a rainy day.
Say for example that McInnes desperately wants Ryan Christie permanently signed from Celtic. Celtic say he will cost £1m. McInnes normal budget won’t allow him to be able to make that signing as his transfer funds will be vastly depreciated. The dna money is £1m strong in the bank (example), do you think McInnes can just say well that money was extra funds for my transfer window etc so I am going to sign Christie as now we have the available funds...and Milne won’t mind as it is not his money anyway.
Absolutely no chance! The quicker you folks realise that you are keeping the multi millionaires from spending their vast funds the better. It’s a disgraceful con at best!

[DollyLongstaffe]

Your post is not reality though, it’s supposition.

The element of supposition is introduced purely to illustrate the argument. The argument itself (that there will be no way of telling whether or not the dna money has been spent purely on the footballing side, and that it is questionable to raise money on the basis of a promise that you will not be able to demonstrate has been kept) is not supposition.

[Aldo1983]

The element of supposition is introduced purely to illustrate the argument. The argument itself (that there will be no way of telling whether or not the dna money has been spent purely on the footballing side, and that it is questionable to raise money on the basis of a promise that you will not be able to demonstrate has been kept) is not supposition.

There's an alarm going off in his head everytime someone dares question anything about the club.

[Mason89]

The element of supposition is introduced purely to illustrate the argument. The argument itself (that there will be no way of telling whether or not the dna money has been spent purely on the footballing side, and that it is questionable to raise money on the basis of a promise that you will not be able to demonstrate has been kept) is not supposition.

Totally agree but you’re going to regret posting that. Be prepared to be bogged down in hair splitting, pointless debate & mind numbing repetition for the next month at least

[afc1903mad]

The element of supposition is introduced purely to illustrate the argument. The argument itself (that there will be no way of telling whether or not the dna money has been spent purely on the footballing side, and that it is questionable to raise money on the basis of a promise that you will not be able to demonstrate has been kept) is not supposition.

I get your point, but surely by reverse process you can calculate how much the budget would have been affected without the DNA contributions.

[Pacman1903]

One thing we cant deny though is hes a hun pandering c@nt