Leeds United - v - Burnley ***Matchday Thread***

[spaldy]

Watched the game with some friends that weren't Leed's supporters.

They did confirm some of my thoughts. Nice to have someone objective affirm it.

-Joffy is very good. They don't really understand why he's not playing more minutes.
- Firpo looked good. However, the concern is defense since Burnley don't really push the ball.
-Meslier is a superb keep. They can't believe he's as young as he is.
- Forshaw is very solid. they could not believe he was out for 2 years.
- They could not believe how much ground Dallas covers.

One observation that will wind up up Leeds supporters. They did not think Raphihna was a 60 million player and he would not get regular playing time at Bayern (one of my friends lives in Germany and hates them).




-

[denver11]

Even the haters would have to be touched by that hug

WRONG!! (see above post).

[denver11]

It's the posters on here who feed this troll. He always says s hit like that but people take the bait instead of ignoring him. And he loves that. I reckon he loves us to get beat so gloat over it.

[WTF11]

Please could you stop your arguing style ["ad hominem"] - as attacking the person rather than the argument itself & then distorting the other person's argument and then attacking the distortion is rather tedious Mr WTF.

Many points discussed come from some of the best information sources, many people here realise they'll be attacked 'ad hominem' by you [myself included] resulting in flat forum debate & only dominance being pursued in the content of a discussion, sadly far to often using a host of 'dirty tricks' designed to intimidate.

Maybe you can kindly explain to me via a post 'exactly' what your wanting from Leeds Utd & how your clear formula solutions should be implemented where & how ?

"Stop attacking the person....." having been called a w4anker simply because I'm not as enthused about a hug.

Neither was I "distorting" anything, simply suggesting that a victory against Burnley isn't sufficient to get all worked up about.

I made no suggestion as to what should be done at LUFC, the comment about the hug neither invited it nor needed it. I desist from such suggestions anyway, as my non-attendance at ER renders such opinions null and void.

I suggest you review again what I said in response to Whitestompers post, and the response I got, then please explain what basis you have for your criticisms.

[hopelesslyoptimistic]

"Stop attacking the person....." having been called a w4anker simply because I'm not as enthused about a hug.

Neither was I "distorting" anything, simply suggesting that a victory against Burnley isn't sufficient to get all worked up about.

I made no suggestion as to what should be done at LUFC, the comment about the hug neither invited it nor needed it. I desist from such suggestions anyway, as my non-attendance at ER renders such opinions null and void.

I suggest you review again what I said in response to Whitestompers post, and the response I got, then please explain what basis you have for your criticisms.

I can only assume you are havin’ a larf.

You are either the biggest wind up merchant or else somewhat disenchanted with the world and venting on here.

A lot of people no longer post on here in large part due to you attacking the poster, their sanity, their intelligence etc or just being down right rude or insulting. I tend to pick you up on that behaviour more than most as I just think it is wrong.

It is also slightly ironic that you bemoan ALAW when if you feel isolated from that the answer is most likely staring you right in the face should you look in the mirror.

It was noticeable how pleasant the threads were when you had your self imposed stay away from the forum.

The only person not to wish anyone Merry Christmas or Happy New Year seemed to be you - so ALAW yep but it’s a state of mind and attitude as much as anything and one I am not sure you currently have.

We all have personal issues and rubbish going on in life and I feel sorry for anyone who is struggling - it is no excuse for consistent prolonged bad behaviour though.

[spaldy]

WTF,

I believe you sincerely want what's best for LUFC. Your thoughts are sometimes spot on. I don't agree with all of them just as I'm sure you don't agree with mine. If we were sitting at a pub it would be banter and arguing but we'd agree on some things and disagree on others. I don't think we'd be screaming or punching each other.

Some thoughts for what it's worth. I am someone that was always straight ahead and aggressive on communication and business dealings. After several stints where I was deemed the problem and finally realizing that maybe I was part, or all of the problem, I finally paid attention in the self help classes. It was not easy. I don't like touchy feely soft skills type of lectures. I still fail miserably at times but do try.

The simplest and easiest thing was trying to be inclusive in writing and communicating. My work is a "team" atmosphere so I really try to avoid words such as I or you and focus more on us or them. If you think about it we are kind of a team of supporters. we don't get paid for any of this but it's a fun diversion from life. When we are communicating on the blog I try to think in terms of a team of individuals working toward a goal. while none of us have a say so on how the team is run it's still nice to have a place to say our piece. Not much different than sitting at a pub. Make the concept about the group and not personal.

Just my 2 cents. i still fight the tendency to attack and make something personal rather than a business or group concept. It's an ongoing process that requires effort for me.

[hopelesslyoptimistic]

To be fair and for what it’s worth - in the middle of last year’s lockdown you showed a lot more consideration and sometimes compassion on here with moments of kindness to others when some were struggling - hence I don’t get the reversion to aggression.

I also don’t always agree with you but you often make decent points or offer a different point of view.

[WTF11]

WTF,

I believe you sincerely want what's best for LUFC. Your thoughts are sometimes spot on. I don't agree with all of them just as I'm sure you don't agree with mine. If we were sitting at a pub it would be banter and arguing but we'd agree on some things and disagree on others. I don't think we'd be screaming or punching each other.

Some thoughts for what it's worth. I am someone that was always straight ahead and aggressive on communication and business dealings. After several stints where I was deemed the problem and finally realizing that maybe I was part, or all of the problem, I finally paid attention in the self help classes. It was not easy. I don't like touchy feely soft skills type of lectures. I still fail miserably at times but do try.

The simplest and easiest thing was trying to be inclusive in writing and communicating. My work is a "team" atmosphere so I really try to avoid words such as I or you and focus more on us or them. If you think about it we are kind of a team of supporters. we don't get paid for any of this but it's a fun diversion from life. When we are communicating on the blog I try to think in terms of a team of individuals working toward a goal. while none of us have a say so on how the team is run it's still nice to have a place to say our piece. Not much different than sitting at a pub. Make the concept about the group and not personal.

Just my 2 cents. i still fight the tendency to attack and make something personal rather than a business or group concept. It's an ongoing process that requires effort for me.

Not disagreeing with you one iota Spaldy, however examination of the posts that sparked off the particular tiff might bear examination?.

The issue on this thread (as often happens, but is very rarely remarked upon in the same manner as contributions I might make) was the personal abuse from a certain poster contained in post #69, generated because (presumably) they felt that disagreement with the general love-in regarding Bielsas hug qualified for such a comment. I believe my response was measured and temperate by comparison, and referred to a need to judge the teams performance against slightly more challenging opposition than that which was faced on Sunday, and celebrate accordingly.

Post #74 departed from anything previously posted, commencing with comments such as “Please could you stop your arguing style ["ad hominem"] - as attacking the person rather than the argument itself & then distorting the other person's argument and then attacking the distortion is rather tedious Mr WTF." (I fail to see how any of my posts on this thread attacked anyone, as opposed to querying why the hug was so remarkable, given the circumstances?) That same post ended, for reasons that defy reason, with the request to "kindly explain to me via a post 'exactly' what your wanting from Leeds Utd & how your clear formula solutions should be implemented where & how ?”

I don't mind any of this, although I do adopt differing posting styles over time, and according to circumstance and subject, as is common practice. I don't even mind to any great extent that those who post the kind of contributions referred to above escape any kind of censure, mild criticism or even the kind of thoughtful guidance given by you, quite the opposite.

Questioning others opinions is a large part of what a forum is all about, whereas mutual backslapping seems unlikely to generate much in the way of continuing debate.

And as to the comments in #82, my comments at that time were primarily with regards to the impact that lockdown was having, not LUFC, so relating to real life (and death) not the ephemera that football was, and is (Bill Shankly was soooooo wrong!).

[Billyni]

Do you need a hug WTF 🤗🤗😊😊

[Monaco_Totty]

"Stop attacking the person....." having been called a w4anker simply because I'm not as enthused about a hug.

Neither was I "distorting" anything, simply suggesting that a victory against Burnley isn't sufficient to get all worked up about.

I made no suggestion as to what should be done at LUFC, the comment about the hug neither invited it nor needed it. I desist from such suggestions anyway, as my non-attendance at ER renders such opinions null and void.

I suggest you review again what I said in response to Whitestompers post, and the response I got, then please explain what basis you have for your criticisms.

Happy clapper I am not - have posted considered, consistent, positive, hopefully balanced informative opinions yes.

Less dewy-eyed than some ?
We won, got 3 points & tamed Burnley tactical threats all over the pitch.

The hug & Very ordinary Burnley who didn't get physical ?
The hug was/is emotion after watching his players adhere well to a well prepared tactical plan over 90 minutes stopping Burnley getting physical.

Roberts mentioned ?
You simply cannot resist can you Mr Anonymous.

We have a squad/1st team capable of doing business in PL ?
We put a 'team' out in horrendous circumstances yet again in a hyped up high pressure PL game.
Again, players who have been in & out all performed well - what's not to admire or like about such a display.

West Ham, Everton, Villa, Newcastle ?
Well, it's one game at a time & I'll like to see us play with a settled eleven and if that can happen we will beat them.
I as a person like to give hugs & not ashamed to shed a tear nowadays as once I was 'bitter' about my health circumstances - looking back it was the wrong approach and via a huge 'team effort' around me I now feel the benefits of shedding the shackles I self imposed and that's what I see Bielsa doing with his wonderful inspirational personality that his players & staff are trying to reproduce in trust.

If you spend a day in Leeds you'll fully get what I mean as the city is fully behind the team - everyone from schools to elderly residential homes, I'm sorry your missing that experience.
Happy New Year.