Sturgeonland

[Disco Buc]

Right lads back on topic .
For me I'm not and cold on Nicola and feel we have better politicians than her in the YES campaign.

Do like Ian Blackford and a few others.

[redscot]

List them ya sh1tebag

List what, things that new invented groups that are offended by everything that never existed until a few years ago?

Must be great being a social warrior.

[Mason89]

Not seen a bottle crash like that since Dens Park 86

[redscot]

Not seen a bottle crash like that since Dens Park 86

I bet a pound to a penny you couldnt give a phuck back then.

All aboard the offended bus.

[Mason89]

I bet a pound to a penny you couldnt give a phuck back then.

All aboard the offended bus.

Give a f*ck about what? You’re awfully shy about saying. The only person doing any censoring here is yourself

[redscot]

Give a f*ck about what? You’re awfully shy about saying. The only person doing any censoring here is yourself

Thats not true though is it?

You are happy to shut down anything you disagree with by playing the "racist/right wing" card.

[InversneckieDob]

List what, things that new invented groups that are offended by everything that never existed until a few years ago?

Must be great being a social warrior.

I'm curious as well.
What specific phrases or deeds would you like to utter/undertake that you now can't?

I tend to nae get involved in these type of discussions as I'm still of the mind that DD's sub-Daily Mail reactionary shtick is a wind up.

I can only talk for me, when I was a younger man I used pejorative racist and homophobic language as a matter of course.
I could justify it by saying it was "of its time" or it was the accepted norm or even that a'body else did it.

In truth it was because I was a pr1ck.

Now I don't act that way.
Nae because someone has telt me I canna but because I like to think I've evolved/matured/improved as a person.

I genuinely canna think of phraseology or deed that a non-@rsehole would wish to use or undertake that the "woke brigade" has "banned".

But I'm happy to hear arguments to the contrary?

[RED_JOHN]

I believe that people being gay and transgender is wrong. You are either a male or a female at birth and you should advance in life as that ***.
I will still treat people who are gay and transgender etc as i would do with anyone else on other matters that don’t involve their ***uality. I might be old fashioned that way but I know it is right. Men weren’t meant to have *** with other men no matter what anyone says. We were created to be with the opposite ***. If I have offended anyone I don’t particularly care.

[redscot]

I'm curious as well.
What specific phrases or deeds would you like to utter/undertake that you now can't?

I tend to nae get involved in these type of discussions as I'm still of the mind that DD's sub-Daily Mail reactionary shtick is a wind up.

I can only talk for me, when I was a younger man I used pejorative racist and homophobic language as a matter of course.
I could justify it by saying it was "of its time" or it was the accepted norm or even that a'body else did it.

In truth it was because I was a pr1ck.

Now I don't act that way.
Nae because someone has telt me I canna but because I like to think I've evolved/matured/improved as a person.

I genuinely canna think of phraseology or deed that a non-@rsehole would wish to use or undertake that the "woke brigade" has "banned".

But I'm happy to hear arguments to the contrary?

Good for you, you were a racist homophobe but have seen the light.

[InversneckieDob]

Wow.
A lot to unpack there.
Any idea why you feel that way?

What's your thoughts on individuals who are attracted to other people of the same gender?

Why do you think they feel that way?

Should they be punished for feeling that way? Or acting on those feelings?

You mention men being intimate with other men, are women who want to be with other women as "wrong"?