
Originally Posted by
Brin
Derbs, for the record I respect your points but we do differ slightly.
Brin I understand your point but I don't agree. It is his agents job to look after Hugills not Evans, the football world will know all about Hugill and won't make a decision based on whether he scores a couple of goals for us, it will be a much more rounded view and also with a huge amount of discussion with his agent and the player if allowed - I think with his current return and antics, the club would probably love Hugill to ask to leave. His wage alone would be a large burden lifted and could be used to probably bring two players in.
As for Osong he has played one game and scored, how many goals has Holmes or Hungbo scored? The lad comes from a highly rated academy and is very well thought of, he is a young man away from his parent club, such players need to be managed differently to get the best out of them. We have an awful track record of dealing with young loaned players. This is a big issue, when you damage the relationship with these academies and clubs that reduces your options going forward, do you think Arsenal will send us another player after the Norton-Cuffy situation.
I think you've got yourself confused here pal. Neither Holmes or Hungbo are centre forwards but play out on the wing, hence why they were brought on yesterday, albeit too late for my liking. As for Osong, he's played one full game against Newcastle's U21 side and yes he scored. He has also come off the subs bench 6 times and played approx 49 mins. I agree maybe he could have been used more but only Evans knows why he's played so little time.
As for damaging relationships with other clubs, yes this can be a dangerous practice if we don't use loanees more but, we don't see how Osong applies himself in training and Evans/Raynor do. Is there something that stops him from starting a game via his effort/application during training sessions? As for comparing Hugill's efforts of late, I'm in agreement, use the lad more and let Hugill sit it out for a change. You never know, it might induce Hugill to call his agent and ask for a move.
Evans job is to win football matches, at the moment we have lost more than we have won, we have 14 points from 12 games that is 54 points over a season which in the last 4 years would have been 17th, 16th, 16th, 17th. Do you think that will be seen as success by TS this season, especially as Evans has told us we will be challenging for promotion? We have seen nothing from Hugill in a season and a quarter that makes him worth a shirt, the fake head/leg injury yesterday was the last straw.
No that won't be seen as a success, however, the season end is along way off so it's hard to speculate we may finish 16th/17th. Yes, I agree about Hugill's antics yesterday. One minute he's writhing in agony next he's up and about, you have to question that? For me he was like Eaves, very little end product but, and don't laugh, there is a player in there somewhere.
Cayton says Osong sits on his own, why? The club captain is sat behind him, why isn't he taking the lad under his arm and getting him to sit with them, why is it the lads fault? Now he might get 3 or 4 games or good run outs and fail, but he deserves the chance and not to be judged on 5 minutes here and 1 minute at Peterborough. I am sorry for sticking up for the lad, but history shows us that the issue with young players is the club and not the players
Can't comment on why he chooses to sit alone but you've got to admit, it's a strange one. Has any other of the players sat and talked to him? Invited him to sit with them? Has he told anyone he prefers to sit alone? On his future appearances, we saw yesterday that Evans preferred to leave Hugill on the bench and Osong wasn't even picked to make the bench, so, is he injured?